Hello, another oddity I noticed in draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-02.txt:
Since "objectCheckType" (for check commands) and "objectCDType" (for check responses) now practically contain the same elements (and both reference "commandType"), it is possible for a registrar to specify fees and credits along with all checked commands. The draft's text makes no mention of this possibility, so I assume that this is simply not supported and should either be ignored or cause an error response. Alternatively, it may be intended that this shall serve as an extended check whether the specified "assumed" fees and credits are correct for a given domain name/command/phase/period combination. This should be clarified. Generally, I'd prefer a schema which more rigidly defines correct commands and responses, even if this means that certain XSD type definitions cannot easily be reused for defining requests and responses. Best regards, Thomas Corte -- TANGO REGISTRY SERVICES® is a product of: Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH Technologiepark Phone: +49 231 9703-222 Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 Fax: +49 231 9703-200 D-44227 Dortmund E-Mail: supp...@tango-rs.com Germany _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
