Rik
Regards,
Gustavo
From: Rik Ribbers mailto:rik.ribb...@sidn.nl>>
Date: Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 03:36
To: Gustavo Lozano mailto:gustavo.loz...@icann.org>>
Cc: "regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>"
mailto:regext@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [regext] regext - U
egext@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [regext] regext - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF
96
> Gustavo,
>
> I have been reading
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/gtlds/translation-transliteration-contact-fina
> l-12jun15-en.pdf until Recommendation #1
>
> What happened t
lto:rik.ribb...@sidn.nl>>
Date: 7/21/16 12:43 PM (GMT+01:00)
To: Gustavo Lozano mailto:gustavo.loz...@icann.org>>
Cc: regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [regext] regext - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 96
Gustavo,
I have been reading
http://
+1
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message
From: Rik Ribbers
Date: 7/21/16 12:43 PM (GMT+01:00)
To: Gustavo Lozano
Cc: regext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [regext] regext - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 96
Gustavo,
I have been reading
Gustavo,
I have been reading
http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/gtlds/translation-transliteration-contact-final-12jun15-en.pdf
until Recommendation #1
What happened to Recommendation #1 The Working Group recommends that it is not
desirable to make transformation of contact information mandatory.
Hello Colleagues,
I published draft-lozano-regext-epp-transf-contact-inf-00 in order to add
support for Transliteration and Translation of Contact
Information in EPP. I would like to discuss this draft during the IETF96.
The draft can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lozano-r
Hello Colleagues,
I would like to discuss the status of:
* draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec-01
* draft-lozano-rdap-nameservers-sharing-name-01
I am working in the support for Transliteration and Translation of Contact
information in RDAP and EPP, see
http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/gtlds/tra
The change that was made was to reduce the requested schedule time to 90
minutes from 2 hours.
It seems the IETF schedule is overbooked and they were asking WG chairs
to reconsider their meeting requests.
Although we have a number of active documents at this time we are not
expecting new wor
