The change that was made was to reduce the requested schedule time to 90
minutes from 2 hours.
It seems the IETF schedule is overbooked and they were asking WG chairs
to reconsider their meeting requests.
Although we have a number of active documents at this time we are not
expecting new work discussions as we had the last time, so the chairs
believed the shorter time was reasonable.
Thanks!
Antoin and Jim
On 10 Jun 2016, at 9:40, "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool" wrote:
An update to a meeting session request has just been submitted by Jim
Galvin, a Chair of the regext working group.
---------------------------------------------------------
Working Group Name: Registration Protocols Extensions
Area Name: Applications and Real-Time Area
Session Requester: Jim Galvin
Number of Sessions: 1
Length of Session(s): 1.5 Hours
Number of Attendees: 50
Conflicts to Avoid:
First Priority: dnsop dnssd dprive dbound dane lager homenet
Second Priority: ianaplan
Special Requests:
Please avoid conflicts with, in order:
1. DNS BOFs
2. ART BOFs
3. ART WGs
---------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
