Sorry... Addendum to the technical comment quoted below:
The document uses the term "variant" extensively, but does not
define it either. That term seems essential to what is going on
in this document. It des not appear in RFC 8499 (which is not
cited in any event). The term was introduced into
--On Sunday, October 13, 2019 16:25 +0200 Barry Leiba
wrote:
>> The Abstract ans Section 1 say: "This is a non-standard
>> proprietary extension." I understand that this is not a
>> standards track document, so the "non-standard" part makes
>> sense. However, what is the point of publishing a
Works for me: I had suggested “proprietary”, so I will now unsuggest it.
Authors, sorry about that: please remove that word in both places the next
time you make a revision. Thanks.
Barry
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 1:29 PM Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On 13 Oct 2019, at 7:25, Barry Leiba wrote:
>
> >> T
On 13 Oct 2019, at 7:25, Barry Leiba wrote:
The Abstract ans Section 1 say: "This is a non-standard proprietary
extension." I understand that this is not a standards track document,
so
the "non-standard" part makes sense. However, what is the point of
publishing a "proprietary" extension as a
> The Abstract ans Section 1 say: "This is a non-standard proprietary
> extension." I understand that this is not a standards track document, so
> the "non-standard" part makes sense. However, what is the point of
> publishing a "proprietary" extension as an RFC. I would hope that
> interoperable
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "Russ Housley via Datatracker"
> 发送时间: 2019-10-10 23:02:57 (星期四)
> 收件人: sec...@ietf.org
> 抄送: draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration@ietf.org, i...@ietf.org,
> regext@ietf.org
> 主题: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11
>
> Reviewer:
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Has Issues
I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area
Directors. Document authors, documen
