Not following the same semantics of an specific gTLD registry that was the
first to adopt Thick WHOIS is different from not following the EPP standard.
I agree with Thomas that those specific examples are not EPP, but all gTLDs and
most ccTLDs follow EPP to the letter.
Rubens
> Em 22 de
* Changing of the EPP XML URIs or making non-backward compatible changes to
the XML schema files should not be classified as EPP, since the same client
software cannot be used with the server independent of the server policy
differences.
There are dozens of cases like this, and absolutely n
Hello Tobias,
On 22.08.24 08:37, Tobias Sattler wrote:
I investigated which ccTLD might run EPP a while ago based on publicly
available information.
I don’t know if those ccTLDs are following this list, and I cannot guarantee its 100% correctness,
but maybe it helps you.
https://docs.googl
I agree that changing the EPP XML URIs or customizing the XML schema files,
where backward compatibility is not maintained, is not EPP. I had to modify
the EPP XML schemas a couple times (e.g., support I-D RGP "(pre/post)Whois"
elements and the RGP RFC "(pre/post)Data" elements during a transit
Sadly that’s true for a LOT of both ccTLDs and gTLDs …
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Hosting & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com
@mneylon
Sent from mobile so typos and brevity are normal
> On 22 Aug 2024, at 10:09, Thomas Corte (TANGO support)
> wrote:
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please use cauti
Hello,
On 22.08.24 08:37, Tobias Sattler wrote:
I investigated which ccTLD might run EPP a while ago based on publicly
available information.
I don’t know if those ccTLDs are following this list, and I cannot guarantee its 100% correctness,
but maybe it helps you.
https://docs.google.com/s
45
Twitter / <https://twitter.com/remasse> @remasse
7 rue du 8 mai 1945
78280 Guyancourt
<https://www.afnic.fr/> www.afnic.fr
De : Tobias Sattler
Envoyé : jeudi 22 août 2024 08:37
À : George Michaelson
Cc : Orie Steele ; Registration Protocols
Extensions
Objet : [regext] Re
Pretty much all the TLDs on the patrons list of this site use EPP
https://cocca.org.nz/ which should add about 50 or so
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 11:37 PM Tobias Sattler wrote:
> I investigated which ccTLD might run EPP a while ago based on publicly
> available information.
>
> I don’t know if th
I investigated which ccTLD might run EPP a while ago based on publicly
available information.
I don’t know if those ccTLDs are following this list, and I cannot guarantee
its 100% correctness, but maybe it helps you.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IMk5TBzeoJTOwDJfQ-I50Kztwr3bipdjcLKy1e
please post back, or write it up online somewhere and point us at it!
_G
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 8:08 AM Orie Steele wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was chatting with Paul Hoffman, about Restful EPP, and we were wondering
> how many ccTLDs using EPP are following this list.
>
> If you don't mind messaging
10 matches
Mail list logo
