Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search

2023-02-03 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Tom, please find my comments below. Il 30/01/2023 01:58, Tom Harrison ha scritto: On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 03:27:17PM +0100, Antoin Verschuren wrote: Hi all, can all people that commented on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search since the start of the previous last call (Tom, Pawel, Jasdip)

Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search

2023-01-29 Thread Tom Harrison
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 03:27:17PM +0100, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > Hi all, can all people that commented on > draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search since the start of the > previous last call (Tom, Pawel, Jasdip) confirm that all their > issues are now addressed in version 17, so that the documen

Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search

2022-12-20 Thread Jasdip Singh
: Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 4:50 AM To: Jasdip Singh , Antoin Verschuren , "regext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search Hi Jasdip, seems to me that the majority was so much in favor of both the help response extension and the ad-hoc IANA registry t

Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search

2022-12-20 Thread Mario Loffredo
n Verschuren *Date: *Monday, December 19, 2022 at 10:04 AM *To: *"regext@ietf.org" *Subject: *Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search Hi all, can all people that commented on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search since the start of the previous last call (Tom, Pawel, Jasdip) confirm

Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search

2022-12-19 Thread Pawel Kowalik
:04 AM *To: *"regext@ietf.org" *Subject: *Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search Hi all, can all people that commented on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search since the start of the previous last call (Tom, Pawel, Jasdip) confirm that all their issues are now addressed in ve

Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search

2022-12-19 Thread Jasdip Singh
xt@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search Hi all, can all people that commented on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search since the start of the previous last call (Tom, Pawel, Jasdip) confirm that all their issues are now addressed in version 17, so that the docume

Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search

2022-12-19 Thread Antoin Verschuren
Hi all, can all people that commented on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search since the start of the previous last call (Tom, Pawel, Jasdip) confirm that all their issues are now addressed in version 17, so that the document shepherd can confirm there are no new changes to be expected during WG

[regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search

2022-12-01 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Chairs, this is to inform you that I'm ready to submit the new rdap-reverse-search version addressing the feedback provided during the LC, i.e. reverse searech properties discovery and registration. Hopefully, no futher feedback will be provided. Would like to know how to proceed now. Sh