Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search

Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:21:57 -0800 

Hi,

The current draft addresses all the points I've brought up.
One of the points was actually the discoverability. The draft describes 4 predefined search properties: fn, handle, email, role. The support for all of them is optional, so the client would not know if the query is supported or not, other than try&error approach. /help structure solves this issue.
The other point was about adding new reverse search properties. One way is to always require an extension for new reverse search properties, even if no new data structures are added (e.g. search by telephone number). This approach will use an existing IANA registry. The solution proposed by Mario adds a new IANA registry for reverse search properties. It would offer better transparency and consistency over reverse search properties across the extensions. 

Kind Regards,
Pawel

Am 19.12.22 um 16:18 schrieb Jasdip Singh:


Hi.
Per the comments in [1], it would be good to settle if the proposed discovery and IANA registration of reverse search properties is an overkill or not. Specifically: 

  * Is the newly proposed "reverse_search_properties" member in the
    help response (section 5) needed?
  * Is the newly proposed "RDAP Reverse Search Properties" registry
    (section 9.2) needed?

Thanks,

Jasdip
[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/baN_jHO32rRLTbzef6B5Rtep29g/
*From: *regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Antoin Verschuren <ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org> 
*Date: *Monday, December 19, 2022 at 10:04 AM
*To: *"regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
*Subject: *Re: [regext] New version of rdap-reverse-search
Hi all, can all people that commented on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search since the start of the previous last call (Tom, Pawel, Jasdip) confirm that all their issues are now addressed in version 17, so that the document shepherd can confirm there are no new changes to be expected during WGLC?
Once we have confirmation, we will issue a 3th WGLC when the document is stable. 

Regards,

Jim and Antoin



    Op 1 dec. 2022, om 14:24 heeft Mario Loffredo
    <mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it> het volgende geschreven:

    Hi Chairs,

    this is to inform you that I'm ready to submit the new
    rdap-reverse-search version addressing the feedback provided
    during the LC, i.e. reverse searech properties discovery and
    registration.

    Hopefully, no futher feedback will be provided.

    Would like to know how to proceed now.

    Should I ask for a new WGLC?

    Will you do that?


    Best,

    Mario
-- Dott. Mario Loffredo 
    Technological Unit “Digital Innovation”
    Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT)
    National Research Council (CNR)
    via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
    Phone: +39.0503153497
    Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo

    _______________________________________________
    regext mailing list
    regext@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext




_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to