Ok, Ted, I can buy this, albeit somewhat reluctantly and noting
that the IAB has passed IAB documents that require community
consensus off to the IESG for determination of that consensus in
the past. I believe a paragraph of explanation, in your
personal capacity and very much along the lines of w
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:27 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
> >> Unless there are considerations that I don't understand, I
> >> agree with Frank and would go a step further. While the
> >> document indicates that IRIS was not actually deployed for
> >> address registry usage, as far as I know it
--On Monday, January 29, 2018 10:11 -0800 Ted Hardie
wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in replying; I was returning from the QUIC
> meeting in Melbourne.
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:13 AM, John C Klensin
> wrote:
>> --On Thursday, January 25, 2018 14:55 +0100 Frank Ellermann
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
Sorry for the delay in replying; I was returning from the QUIC meeting in
Melbourne.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:13 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>
> --On Thursday, January 25, 2018 14:55 +0100 Frank Ellermann
> wrote:
>
> > On 22 January 2018, Ted Hardie wrote:
> >> If you have thoughts
> >
> > Ma
Jan 25, 2018, at 5:42 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>
> --On Thursday, January 25, 2018 10:20 -0500 Andrew Newton
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:13 AM, John C Klensin
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Unless there are considerations that I don't understand, I
>>> agree with Frank and would go a st
--On Thursday, January 25, 2018 10:20 -0500 Andrew Newton
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:13 AM, John C Klensin
> wrote:
>>
>> Unless there are considerations that I don't understand, I
>> agree with Frank and would go a step further. While the
>> document indicates that IRIS was not ac
On 2018-01-25 10:20 -0500, Andrew Newton wrote:
> My understanding is that DCHK did get deployed by two domain
> registries. I do not know if they still use it though.
It was deployed by .DE and .FR
.DE stopped it on December 2013:
https://www.denic.de/en/whats-new/news/article/shutdown-of-domai
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:13 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
> Unless there are considerations that I don't understand, I agree
> with Frank and would go a step further. While the document
> indicates that IRIS was not actually deployed for address
> registry usage, as far as I know it has not been
--On Thursday, January 25, 2018 14:55 +0100 Frank Ellermann
wrote:
> On 22 January 2018, Ted Hardie wrote:
>> If you have thoughts
>
> Maybe "obsoletes 4698" instead of only "updates 4698" would be
> clearer for readers of RFC 4698.
Ted,
Unless there are considerations that I don't understan
