would help drive adoption
and make our lives easier
Regards,
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com/
https://blacknight.blog/
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Personal blog: https://michele.
The minimum dataset isn’t the same thing as “thin”
And of course we’re seeing plenty of “variations” anyway :)
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com/
https://blacknight.blog/
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (
Sadly that’s true for a LOT of both ccTLDs and gTLDs …
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Hosting & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com
@mneylon
Sent from mobile so typos and brevity are normal
> On 22 Aug 2024, at 10:09, Thomas Corte (TANGO support)
> wrote:
>
> [EXTERNAL E
includes terms that are not in anyway standard as if they were eg. 2.8,
2.9, 2.11
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com/
https://blacknight.blog/
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Personal
gTLD space this is just as bad and probably worse.
My concern is that while technically a protocol might be able to do something
I’d hate to see people assuming that just because it was “possible” it had been
implemented fully and properly.
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight
Sorry, but why would RDAP be used for this?
I know that whois is used by a lot of people for this, but it really shouldn’t
be. Only a direct EPP query to the registry can give a “sane” response.
What am I missing?
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting
