+1 for adoption
// Eric
From: Jorge Cano
Sent: 07 July 2025 17:15
To: regext@ietf.org
Subject: [regext] EXTENDED CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-brown-rdap-ttl-extension
Hi all,
This is an extended adoption request for RDAP Extension for DNS
Time-To-Live:
https:
Thanks Scott!
Agree with everything you said.
// Eric - The Swedish Internet Foundation
From: Hollenbeck, Scott
Sent: 28 May 2025 15:41
To: iana-prot-param-comm...@iana.org
Cc: regext@ietf.org
Subject: [regext] Re: [IANA #1419774] Swedish Internet Foundation IA
+1 from me as well
// Eric Skoglund
From: Andrew (andy) Newton
Sent: 29 April 2025 15:22
To: James Galvin ; REGEXT Working Group
Subject: [regext] Experimental Extensions (was Re: ONE WEEK REVIEW of FINAL
proposed revised charter for REGEXT)
Hi all,
The
Hi Jim,
I support the adoption of both. I'm willing to contribute and review text.
// Eric
From: James Galvin
Sent: 03 February 2025 15:05
To: Registration Protocols Extensions
Subject: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-yao-regext-epp-quic and
draft-loffredo-re
After Jim Goulds presentation on implementing EoH and EoQ I was inspired to
start hacking on the two protocols in our own EPP server implementation, while
doing so, some questions about EoH popped up.
In the EoH draft there is a couple of MUSTs for the client when sending a
request:
- The GET
+1
From: James Galvin
Sent: 24 June 2024 15:26
To: REGEXT Working Group
Subject: [regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-03
The Chairs have decided to extend this WGLC last call for two weeks, one more
week from the date of this message. There has o
Did a quick readthrough this evening, found some minor nits.
In the paragraph:
"Some domain registrars, acting as EPP clients, have rename host
objects to subdomains of "as112.arpa," such as "empty.as112.arpa"
[risky-bizness-irtf]. This practice has been observed in use."
"rename" should be
Based on the call to action in the meeting yesterday to get involved I'll add
my +1 as well (and +1 to the changes proposed by James).
// Eric Skoglund, The Swedish Internet Foundation (.se & .nu)
From: regext on behalf of Gould, James
Sent: 06 May 2
Hi Victor.
We at .se and .nu recently changed our authcode implementation and for that we
did have a look around to see what other registries were doing.
I don't think we came across anyone looking at a PKI-based approach and to
second what Scott said such an approach would probably find it
hard
To add my 2 cents I agree with Scott here given what the spec says. We've
(Swedish internet foundation) interpreted it in our implementation to mean that
we shouldn't
allow the change to go through.
// Eric Skoglund
From: regext on behalf of Hollenb
10 matches
Mail list logo
