Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
P
No particular text recommendations from me; this seems fine. I was
just observing a phrase fragment that seemed to be either
ungrammatical or not easy to parse. The intent of the text was, and
is, clear though.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 5:50 AM Gould, James wrote:
>
> Erik,
>
> In considering you
Peter, thanks for your review. James, thanks for responding. I entered a No
Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Feb 10, 2021, at 8:59 AM, Gould, James
> wrote:
>
> Peter,
>
> Thank you for your review and feedback. I provide responses to your feedback
> embedded below. The updates based on you
Erik,
In considering your comment:
* "does not define new protocol" -> "does not define a new protocol",
Perhaps
The intent is to indicate that no new EPP protocol elements are defined. How
about changing it to "does not define new EPP protocol elements"? This would
be included in
