No particular text recommendations from me; this seems fine. I was just observing a phrase fragment that seemed to be either ungrammatical or not easy to parse. The intent of the text was, and is, clear though.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 5:50 AM Gould, James <jgo...@verisign.com> wrote: > > Erik, > > In considering your comment: > > * "does not define new protocol" -> "does not define a new protocol", > Perhaps > > The intent is to indicate that no new EPP protocol elements are defined. How > about changing it to "does not define new EPP protocol elements"? This would > be included in the posting of draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-08 along > with addressing the other feedback. > > Thanks, > > -- > > JG > > > > James Gould > Fellow Engineer > jgo...@verisign.com > <applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgo...@verisign.com> > > 703-948-3271 > 12061 Bluemont Way > Reston, VA 20190 > > Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/> > > On 2/17/21, 1:03 AM, "Erik Kline via Datatracker" <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > > Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://secure-web.cisco.com/1EvzkPla5kphOxGVrCWpPS-vQ-Lm067uGD8F4DXzkVahpMJxVLLNs_-Okm_Ik_CTvBNgJoT-07wBTP_Fy6Gb9hOK_l6LDjmTe-zXsSs-o9sODDOeCHT8h_gEU4VOQnLzPyw7l7KgyQAI-uJRyPJnGYzNkWZMPIa6yI_x7q3beroMTMZJekZJz627YN1XJKgtC3A5VoC_gnuwma7Xsp25JJs0RsB1c1lTK2ORGpi6fv9hE7T40WHXiVOukDEqicdWA/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fiesg%2Fstatement%2Fdiscuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://secure-web.cisco.com/1DObBfVwLMA9UQQeYSf2Ee-qWbljZcJZ0rWT1j6mlVZkOwB16KNnSyHTDa8k5iafiIBIbdUaUNsia_qWS9U5Yp0XK9igtqn7evXh9YRW__gCkdEu8opXvs_6gXrx1MTPgubXXQ53ZZUFr-JDX0zCWRkGjs1ox9lOzdMoNdgai0L9wo1MfAJmtZgsclohTVFrzJF_2CRzDjFmjp6309c2OfXgQTZBrsVpTyTlxFkU5MZjYsabZkSkBWfO6y5PY0fgm/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces%2F > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [[ nits ]] > > [ section 4 ] > > * "does not define new protocol" -> "does not define a new protocol", > perhaps > > > > _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
