This is my AD review for draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-09. I have a
handful of
comments below that I'd like to see addressed prior to asking the IESG to
consider the document. Please treat them as you would any other last-call
comments.
There is also one blocking comment that needs to be resolv
Dear Antoin Verschuren,
The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.
Below is the scheduled session information followed by
the original request.
regext Session 1 (2:00 requested)
Tuesday, 6 November 2018, Afternoon Session I 1350-1550
Room Name: Boromphimarn 4 size:
By now you should have seen the draft agenda for IETF103. On it you
will see 8 requests for adopting new documents as working group
milestones. The chairs are concerned that we should not adopt quite
that many new documents all at once.
If you look at our current milestone list, there are 3
Changed milestone "Submit for publication "Registry Fee Extension for EPP"",
resolved as "Done".
URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/regext/about/
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
James Galvin has requested publication of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-14 as
Proposed Standard on behalf of the REGEXT working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees/
___
regext mailing l
Changed milestone "Submit for publication "Change Poll Extension for EPP"",
resolved as "Done".
URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/regext/about/
___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
Hi all,
Please find below the preliminary agenda for Bangkok that I drafted where I
hope I understood all your requests.
I had several messages to work through to gather your requests.
Could each of you that indicated to me they wish to be on the agenda verify
that they are, and please fill in t
Dear Jürgen,
Thanks for your review. I have my feedbacks below starting with [Linlin].
Regards,
Linlin
Linlin Zhou
From: Jürgen Schönwälder
Date: 2018-10-19 16:26
To: ops-...@ietf.org
CC: draft-ietf-regext-org.all; ietf; regext
Subject: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-org-11
Revie
Reviewer: Jürgen Schönwälder
Review result: Has Nits
Thanks for a concise and well written document. I have not run tools
to validate the XSD and the XML artefacts but the definitions all look
reasonable.
Comment:
- What does the following mean in the definition of e164StringType?
I