Dear Stewart,
Thanks for your review. Please see my feedbacks below.
Regards,
Linlin
Linlin Zhou
From: Stewart Bryant
Date: 2018-10-09 00:52
To: gen-...@ietf.org
CC: draft-ietf-regext-org.all; ietf; regext
Subject: [regext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-org-10
Reviewer: Stewart
On 10/8/18 11:52 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
The RFC 2718 normative reference is a bit strange to one that does not normally
work in this area.
Thanks! This is a good catch of a character transposition. The correct
reference here should be RFC 2781 rather than RFC 2718. While this is
still tech
Gurshabad,
I posted draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode-04
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode-04) that
incorporates your feedback with the “The data verified by the VSP MUST be
stored by the VSP along with the generated verification code to address any
compliance i
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the
IETF.
Title : Verification Code Extension for the Extensible
Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
Author : Jame
On Friday 05 October 2018 04:44 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>> If there is only one instance in which this MAY be useful, perhaps there
>> is no need for standardization of this extension?
> If there is at least one example, there is a demonstration of existence of
> utility.
>
> Scott
Thank you
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For m
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
This document defines an extension to EPP object mappings, which is designed to
support assigning an organization to existing and future objects. It should be
read and will be implemented and used together with draft-ietf-regext-org and I
am not sure wh
