On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> In SuSE I have the first Virtual console (tty1?) set in such a way that the
> boot messages are NOT cleared from the screen/buffer when getty starts up
> on that console.
>
> I remember that it has something to do with "noclear" but what file does
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, eric clover wrote:
> is there any known exploits that can just remove a /home dir within a few
> seconds without the hd's thrashing, like just removing any trace of the /home dir
> ever even being there?
You mean running "umount /home" as root if /home is on a separate
parti
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Steve Borho wrote:
> Has anyone tried to compile a C++ program which uses the stdc++ libs
> with 7.0?
Sure - no problems at all here.
> Initially the compile complains it can't find header files. A quick
> glance shows that /usr/include/g++ is no more and that
> /usr/includ
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Jason Costomiris wrote:
> Thoughts about a turn-around/test-cycle for inclusion in the errata for
> Guinness?
I don't think bind9 is an errata candidate for previous releases because
it doesn't have all the functionality bind8 had (yet).
There are also a couple of non-critic
On 5 Oct 2000, nitin jain wrote:
> Can anyone please tell me about an e-mail client for linux like eudora or
> outlook express of windows.It should be easy to install and should have good
> GUI.
kmail? (Part of kdenetwork)
LLaP
bero
___
Redhat-lis
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
> Hm - I hope the latest version of kmail is better than the one that came
> with KDE 1.1.2 Looking forward to 16/10/2000... :-)
Try http://master.kde.org/~bero/rh7/ for the release candidate...
LLaP
bero
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Mark Shaw wrote:
> Is there a version of Redhat 7.0 for the 64bit Alpha architecture
> ???
Not yet, but it'll be there.
We've almost always released the Alpha CPU version after the x86 one...
LLaP
bero
___
Redhat-list mail
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
> How the heck to I find out what version of RED HAT is actually on a
> machine?
cat /etc/redhat-release
rpm -ql redhat-release
LLaP
bero
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.re
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The problem I'm having is my kde menus are pretty trashed. There's 4
> copies of "Task scheduler" in my "Systems" menu, tons of missing icons,
> programs that don't exist etc.
By any chance, did you install both the 2.0pre-RPMs that came with 7.0 an
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
> Looks like the KDE folks only have KDE 2.0 RPMs for RHL 7.0 - has
> anybody out there found RPMs for RHL 6.2 yet, or - failing that - has
> anybody succeeded in rebuilding the RHL 7.0 SRPMs for RHL 6.2?
Go ftp://ftp.linux-easy.com/pub/kde/rh62 for pre
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Thomas Porter wrote:
> Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > Go ftp://ftp.linux-easy.com/pub/kde/rh62 for preliminary versions, at the
> > moment x86 only.
>
> Dear Bernhard,
>
> Sorry for bugging you about such a trivial thing, but my ISP DNS won
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Wahid Belhaouane wrote:
> I installed kde2 under redhat 7.0
> it is true , difficult to install it.
> first when i installed qt , it required libmng.so.0
> i installed all packages (rpm) of libmng of rehat 6.0 (absent in redhat
> 7.0)
Oops, I forgot to upload the package...
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Kevin Tyle wrote:
> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 00 19:11:27 EST
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone can fake mail headers - if I just do something along the lines of
telnet mail.my-isp.com 25
helo foo.com
mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Fernando Rowies wrote:
> I use this sentence in bashrc to have color with ls:
> alias ls='ls --color=tty'
> The question is, how can I modifiy the actual status
> to have i.e. rpm orange, tar red, etc.?
vi /etc/DIR_COLORS
eval `dircolors`
LLaP
bero
--
The first time Micro
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Gary Bricker wrote:
> I have 2 questions about Apache (the latest version), is there a set of the
> Frontpage extentions for it and if so where can I get them.
http://www.darkorb.net/pub/frontpage
> Also do ASP
> files work with Apache with a normal install or is there some
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Wei Jiang wrote:
> Is there anything special that I need to do for activating the pop3 server
> on redhat 6.1. I enabled it in inet.conf
Did you restart inetd after editing inetd.conf? (killall -HUP inetd)
Also, make sure the pop3 server is installed - if you just edit the
i
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, John P. Verel wrote:
> I'm well aware of the 1024 cylinder limitation when LILO is used as the
> primary loader. However, does this limitation also apply if it is the
> secondary loader, e.g., used with BootMagic?
Yes, because it's a BIOS limitation, not a lilo one.
LLaP
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Neil Hollow wrote:
> Er no it didn't. When I did ttmkfdir /usr/share/fonts/truetype a whole load
> of stuff rattled down the screen including some errors of some type. I
> restarted fs w/o problem, but known of the fonts are visible to X. Any
> clues? NH
Ah, yes, I forgot
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Alessandro Coppelli wrote:
> Hi to all.
>
>Is there the RPM for new GCC 2.95.2 ?
Raw Hide (ftp://rawhide.redhat.com/).
LLaP
bero
--
The first time Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is when they
start making vacuum cleaners.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMA
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Robert Fausey wrote:
> Microsoft is considering releasing a Linux version of
> its Windows Media Player.
>
> Any opinions?
Call me paranoid, but I think there are only three possible explanations:
- Vaporware. They announce it so nobody will care enough to release a
repla
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Jeremy Bradley wrote:
> can anyone tell me why I received this when I posted that reply a few
> minutes ago about swap partitions?
>
> Policy = Anti-Spam
> Action on this mail = Quarantine message
An over-sensitive content filter.
I used to get it for all messages when I was
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Michael S. Dunsavage wrote:
> Does linux see more than 64 MEG and if so, how?
Normally, it sees all your RAM out of the box.
If your BIOS is buggy, you might have to add
append="mem=96M"
in your /etc/lilo.conf, right after the image=something line, rerun lilo
and rebo
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Ryan Marinoff wrote:
> >From what I understand, for wine to work properly you must have windows
> itself installed and wine uses the api's from there. Is there an emulator
> of windows that I can use that I don't need to have a registered copy of
> windows?
Yes, wine. wine m
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Bret Hughes wrote:
> Does wine work for the 32 bit stuff?
Yes.
> Say office 97.
Doesn't work.
M$ use a lot of undocumented functions in their tools, and without reverse
engineering (which would be illegal :/ ), we can't duplicate undocumented
APIs.
> When I first heard
>
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
> I cannot find any . Does anybody have a reference ?
ftp://rawhide.redhat.com/pub/rawhide/
--
The first time Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is when they
start making vacuum cleaners.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Patrick O Neil wrote:
> I've got the wine src rpm from rawhide powertools. I rebuilt it
> without difficulty but I cannot install it.
wine-2202-1 is known broken. wine-2202-2 is the good one.
It should appear on rawhide soon (it's been in the devel tree for 2 days)
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
> Well, my main problem about wine is that I still don't know what it
> can actually run or not. Almost anything that was of interest to me
> would NOT run. I checked on the "success lists" and I could never run
> what was suposedly ok on the list.
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Brian Schneider wrote:
> I seem to running into an error getting my printer from one of my linux
> boxes to configure on another. I have done this before, maybe I am being
> braindead or something. Anyone with the correct steps I can try.
If you're running 6.1 without updates
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, magoo wrote:
> I remember see it some where but can't find it now that I need it. Does
> any one know of a tool that will compare 2 text files and find the
> differences between them?
man diff
man cmp
LLaP
bero
--
The first time Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck i
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Navinchandra wrote:
> I am having 3 patitions on my hard disk. One is FAT, One is NTFS, and of
> corse Linux. I can read FAT patition with command *mount -t msdos /dev/hdc1
> /root/nt/c* but cannot read NTFS. WHY?
>
> The command *mount -t NTFS /dev/hdc2 /root/nt/ntf* returns
On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, Navinchandra wrote:
> Can we install Linux on a machine without keyboard, Mouse and a Monitor.
Yes, using kickstart.
The other option is to install everything on a different machine and then
swap disks, or to just plug in a keyboard and monitor during installation
and moving
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Gustav Schaffter wrote:
> I've found both ssh rpms and openssh rpms.
>
> What is more open in openssh than in ssh?
>
> Why would I choose one over the other?
OpenSSH (ftp://ftp.redhat.de/pub/rh-addons/security/*/openssh*) is the way
to go.
ssh used to be under an open-source
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 08:59:54AM -0700, Paul Fontenot wrote:
> >
> > when i try a rpm --rebuild some_file.rpm i get the following error:
> >
> > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.37234: libtoolize: command not found
> >
> > The question is can anyone tell me what pack
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Greg Wright wrote:
> >rpm -i /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/i386/libtool*rpm
> >
>
> I am wondering why the displyed errors etc or the rpms could not be made to
> match i.e
>
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.37234: libtoolize: command not foundto
>
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.37234: libtool: command not f
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Mohammed Ennasar wrote:
> Where can i downlaoding the xemacs package for RedHat 6.0?
It's included in the Red Hat Linux Powertools. Check ftp.redhat.com.
LLaP
bero
--
The first time Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is when they
start making vacuum cleaners.
--
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Gustav Schaffter wrote:
> I have noticed a file /.bash_profile on my system.
>
> But, I also found the two directories /.gnome and /.gnome_private
>
> Can I delete these as well, or do they have any function?
You can safely delete them. This looks like you once created a us
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't know what I did wrong, but on the two machines that I have redhat
> 6.1 installed, I don't have a valid lp0, lp1, or lp2. I have looked at my
> lpr package and everything is installed "or at least it verifies".
echo "alias parport_lowlevel p
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Gate wrote:
> Anyone know where I can some OpenSSL RPMs for Redhat 6.1? Been looking
> around and can't seem to find any.
ftp://ftp.redhat.de/pub/rh-addons/security
LLaP
bero
--
The first time Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is when they
start making vacuum cle
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Mike Lewis wrote:
>
> System=RH6.1 with all the latest updates.
>
> Does the Apache rpm come with mod_perl enabled ?
mod_perl is included, but not enabled in httpd.conf.
vi /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
Look for mod_perl in the file, and remove the "#" signs.
LLaP
bero
--
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Mike Lewis wrote:
> Hmmm that just gives me another error:
>
> Cannot add module via name 'mod_perl.c': not in list of loaded modules
>
> Somewhere, I must be missing something
Make sure you enable every reference to mod_perl in the httpd.conf file -
there are sever
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Gate wrote:
> Is there any free software to do ASPs under Apache? We have a few users
> requesting to use ASPs but really don't want to run an NT server. I've
> heard of software you can buy to do this, but it is too expensive for a
> handful of users.
Get asp2php - it conve
yOn Thu, 10 Feb 2000, AlphaByte wrote:
> Yes, absolutely spot on. I installed RH61 after using RH51 for some two years
> (and found to be a great system) only so I could access the latest glibc for
> Adobe's FrameMaker beta.
>
> Since then I have had no end of problems with getting anything to p
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Jason Pratt wrote:
> If so, what improvements over
> 6.1 have been made?
Aside from the usual (bug fixes, updated packages)
[Not a complete list, just what I remember from the top of my head]:
- Support for Docbook-based SGML editing and processing has been
added.
- The v
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Reimert, Scott wrote:
> How can the Red Hat 6.2 beta contain kernel 2.2.15, as stated:
>
> PIGLET includes the following new features:
> [snip]
> - Kernel 2.2.15
> [snip]
>
> That kernel hasn't been released yet (has it?). From LWN:
>
> "The current s
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Rick Forrester wrote:
> > has anyone tried 6.2? if so how is it?
>
> So far, great. The only minor gotcha is that the kernel is compiled
> with frame buffering;
It's already fixed in our internal tree. Won't be a problem in the final.
So is the other big bug in the beta,
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Frank Carreiro wrote:
> sbni.c:1375: Invalid `asm' statement:
> sbni.c:1375: fixed or forbidden register 1 (sx) was spilled for class
> DREG.
You're trying to compile this kernel with gcc 2.95.x.
Either get the gcc 2.95.x kernel patch
(http://people.redhat.com/bero/gcc295/)
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Brian Schneider wrote:
> I have just set up a 6.1 machine to replace the one I have. I cannot get
> my pop access from another machine working now. Is there some sort of
> access file I need to change to allow me access from another machine.
Make sure you installed the pop3
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Steve Lee wrote:
> how do i make a floppy size
> shown above. I don't have
> fd0H1722 only the standards
> 1440, 1200, 720
>
> how do i create the 1720 size
mknod b 2 60 /dev/fd0u1722
check /usr/src/linux/Documentation/devices.txt
LLaP
bero
--
The first time Microsoft
For the people who think our current beta is buggy:
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2436920,00.html
Our bugzilla is currently at about 9900 bugs, 95% of which are marked
"resolved", "not a bug" or dupes. Seems we have quite some catching up to
do. Shall we ship kernel 0.9.1
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Suddha Sekhar Dey wrote:
> /dev/hda1/export/home vfat auto,rw.
Try
/dev/hda1 /export/homevfatauto,rw 0 0
instead.
Also make sure /export/home exists and is a directory.
LLaP
bero
--
The first time Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is wh
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Nick wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anybody know if it is possible to use Linux workstations with NT file
> servers?
There are two ways to do it - Either use smbmount, which can mount SuckOS
shares on Linux, or install an NFS server on the SuckOS box.
You won't have permissions and
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Ketan wrote:
> guys,
>
> how do I increase the swap partition size w/o repartitioning ?
You can't increase partition sizes without repartitioning obviously.
You can add a swap file though:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/swap.file bs=1k count=1024
mkswap -v1 /tmp/s
On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, Vidiot wrote:
> I found no new RPMs at www.isc.org, just source. The chart seems to indicate
> that the P3 release is just fine.
>
> Anyone at Redhat care to comment on the P5 patch not being on line?
Sure, the P5 patch simply isn't important. All the real problems P5 fixe
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Vidiot wrote:
> For quite a while now "top" has refused to run. It starts, clears the
> screen and quits. No error messages, no nothing.
Works for me... What exactly are you running?
LLaP
bero
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Nick wrote:
> Does anybody know of any free (or very cheap) NICE C development
> environments for Linux.
vi? ;)
> I'm talking nice colourful editors etc...
Then you'll probably want to have a look at http://www.kdevelop.org/.
KDevelop is also included in Powertools.
LLa
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Tressens Lionel wrote:
> I discovered a big problem in ftp running on my box.
>
> Through ftp, any user can set the owner of any file, even if it doesn't
> belong to him.
How? Which commands do you send to change the owner?
LLaP
bero
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Tressens Lionel wrote:
> Sorry, I made a mistake. A user can change the mode of a file, even if it
> doesn't belong to him. (with the command chmod).
What permissions does the file currently have? I can't reproduce it here
right out of the box:
ftp> cd /etc
250 CWD command
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Tressens Lionel wrote:
> You're right on this example.
> Look at this trace (I am user tressens. jarcas is another user) :
I still can't reproduce it here (running wu-ftpd-2.6.0-3). Which versions
have you installed? Are you using any strange authentication methods
(S/Key, O
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Vidiot wrote:
> Anyone know why the kernel in 6.1 won't detect /dev/lp0 at boot time?
Because the installer creates a broken /etc/conf.modules.
Do:
echo "alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc" >>/etc/conf.modules
and it'll work. (This is fixed in 6.2, no need to report the bu
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
> thats great!
>
> But can you (or perhaps Bero) give a better explanation as to how you
> determined the partition sizes?
dumpe2fs -h /dev/hdb1 |grep count
> You might want to remind us what info you
> had to start with etc.
Just a killed partition
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, M. Erickson wrote:
> No need to reformat, toss that windows paradigm aside, learn a new way of
> dealing with things like this! Just update BIND, XFS, and check through
> all your .history/.bash_history files and find out what else has been
> done..
Finding out what else has
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, LomYst wrote:
> Can anybody tell me how to disable and enable services like finger, POP, telnet and
>FTP? I'm working with RH6.1
Look at the /etc/inetd.conf file and man inetd.conf.
LLaP
bero
--
The first time Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is when they
st
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> Anyway to compile perl so it won't compile at run time?
You can try perlcc, which is basically a perl-to-C converter. It doesn't
work perfectly though.
LLaP
bero
--
The first time Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is when they
start making
And here's what it's causing... ;)
STAR TREK 2000
PICARD Captain's log, star date 48101.4. We are proceeding to the
planet taRas. The inhabitants of that planet made contact with earth in
the year 2000, and we haven't heard of them since then.
We have been ordered to in
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
> Not to sound like a party pooper, but can't microsoft sue someone for
> making this site look like theirs and using the name microsoft?
Only if they find out who is running it, and if that person is located in
a country where M$ has any say.
LLaP
ber
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Ayman Nour El DIn wrote:
> i was just wondering if there is a program such as ICQ that runs under linux
> redhat 6
licq, as included in powertools.
LLaP
bero
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Craig Kattner wrote:
> I can't seem to rebuild rpm's that install files into /usr/share/locale
> anymore.
unset LINGUAS
LLaP
bero
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Katherine Harris wrote:
> Hi. I'm completely new to Linux, and have been wrestling with my first
> Linux box since yesterday.
Welcome to the better world. ;)
> The command line works wonderfully, but X won't
> configure to anything useful at all, so we're not on speaking t
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Katherine Harris wrote:
> when I've got the brightness turned to a readable level for the $ prompt, I
> can barely see X when I load it. Vice versa, when I've got X turned to a
> manageable brightness, the shell is almost completely washed out. Shall I
> merely go on dialin
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, erik wrote:
> I have linux installed and running pretty much to my satisfaction for
> now. What i would like to do tho is make a separate partiton for my
> /home directory so when i upgrade, it is easy to keep all of my
> configurations. Is there an easy way yo do this? I
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Ed Schernau wrote:
> Had Linux installed to /dev/hda5, with a /dev/hda6
> as swap.
>
> In DOS, used FDISK to make a new logical drive in
> the extended partition, rebooted and formatted it.
>
> Turns out that D: is now /dev/hda5, and thus my entire
> Linux installation is t
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Timothy Lillicrap wrote:
> Just a quick question. I have seen a great deal of mail about the attack made
> through a weakness in Bind on someones system in the last day or so. Am I in
> danger of being comprimised by this attack I have two RH 6.0 machines
> (esentially
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Jake Johnson wrote:
> I am just curious. I know a lot of windoze users use FTP ratio servers
> for different reasons and I was wondering if it was possible for us Linux
> users. (Wu-FTP)
wu-ftpd does not support ratios.
BeroFTPD (a wu-ftpd derivate) does, but it is no long
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Alan Wilson wrote:
> RedHat ?almost? requires a several day attendance at their
> headquarters to become certified ?
No.
RHCE-300 includes a several-day course (various places are possible),
RHCE-302 is only the certification (takes a couple of hours).
See http://www.re
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Neil Hollow wrote:
> I wish to add tt font support to my linux system. I've copied my fonts to
> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/. I added the path to ~/fs/config. I then tried
> to run ttmkdir. I wasn't sure which dir to run it in (I've read conflicting
> reports) so I tried in
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Vidiot wrote:
> >I had version 8.2.2p3 on my system and got hacked. I was told
> >that the problem was fixed in patch level 4. The current version
> >is at patch level 5. My solution was to download, compile, and
> >install it...
>
> The P3 version that is in Red Hat's sec
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, hUnTeR wrote:
> I hate to barge in here BUT, there is a security upgrade from P3 to P5,
> and i quote from the isc.org page:
Please read your own quote - it specifically says there are NO security
fixes.
> "ISC's BIND 8.2.2-P5 was released on November 12. It
> includes many
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Kevsurf wrote:
> I have a question about my server. I'm running RH6.1 and Apache. I have
> recently been warned about low memory on my machine. I have 64MB's of RAM
> and 61MB is being used right now! The reason is, httpd is running 11 times
> and httpsd is running 7 times
On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, seyedi wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to install xfree86-3.3.1 on my linux system( redhat 6.1), but at first a
>problem exits.
> the problem is: preinst.sh file doesn't run and shows erorr message.
Why do you want to install an ultra-obsolete version of XFree86? It'll
only cause tro
On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, Vidiot wrote:
> The audio stuff appears to not have been loaded with 6.1 either.
sndconfig?
> The installer is SO BROKEN.
It's expectable that the first try had a couple of problems... Get the 6.2
beta and update some packages to what's currently in rawhide and you won't
ha
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> I want to configure a web server that will answer requests for multiple
> machine names (e.g., www.example.com, www2.example.com, etc), displaying
> different home pages depending on the destination name. The machine
> has a single network connection
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Chuck Dale wrote:
> Which command line tools should I use to modify the information in
> /etc/passwd? Like people's shell etc.
chsh und chage?
LLaP
bero
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Mathco Tech. Dep wrote:
> I know this is a beta and i know there are
> alot of bugs in it, but one thing that confuses
> me is that whenever you launch a application under
> KDE it launches Konsole also, is there anyway to shut
> this off?
Sure - get the current KDE RPMs from
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Fred Whipple wrote:
> All,
>
> Does anyone know if RH 6.1 would run on a motherboard with the 840
> chipset @ 133MHz? I'm looking to build a few new servers and need
> stability over bleeding-edge.
Then 6.2 is the way to go - it fixes a number of bugs rather than trying
to
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Steve Dixon wrote:
> i think that is a bug.
It is a bug, and it's been fixed since the day after the beta. Get the
kdebase package from rawhide.
LLaP
bero
>
> "Mathco Tech. Dep" wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I know this is a beta and i know there are
> > alot of bugs in it,
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, erik wrote:
> How do you add another directory to my ftp? I can not use a link
> because it is across a file system.
You can either make it available to real users only, and point the
guestroot at that directory, or just copy the files over (cp -aR
/wherever/whatever /home/f
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Jason Costomiris wrote:
> I'm just trying to make plans for upgrades here, not push for a release
> date... For those who don't know, XFree86 4.0 has been released.
>
> I've got guys who need XFree 4.0 types of functionality (DRI, xinerama)..
> Will there be packages for 6.
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Edward Marczak wrote:
> > 4.0 is MUCH too broken for 6.1 or 6.2 at this time.
>
> I haven't tried it yet, but was about to. What's the probelms with it?
General problems:
- No working configurator
- Not all chipsets that were supported in 3.* are supported
- Complete lack
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Timothy Lillicrap wrote:
> I would like to be able to gain root access through telnet without
> having to go in as a normal user and then su.
Either use ssh (better - if you put up authorization keys, you don't even
need to type the password every time if security is not a c
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Matt Housh wrote:
> > I found, after compiling XFree86 4.0 from source, that xf86config
> > worked fine. Is that a fluke?
>
> It worked here, too. As did `XFree86 -configure`. Not much else did,
> however.
XFree86 -configure does create wor
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why does Gnome (enlightment) open so many ports when it is turned on?
ORBit
> What is it listening for?
CORBA requests.
LLaP
bero
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
For those who complained, XFree86 4.0 packages are now available.
Before even considering to install, keep in mind they're
- unstable and highly experimental, I would NEVER have called this version
a stable release
- 1000% unsupported
- lacking support for some chipsets that used to work
- lack
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Vidiot wrote:
> I have a situation where logins to the machine are not allowed for
> many, so they have a /bin/false as their shell. But, they are allowed
> to do ftp logins, but with the shell set to /bin/false, the login is denied.
>
> What needs to be done to allow ftp u
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > Much like xf86config, it's a nice
> > start for vi /etc/X11/XF86Config, but that's about all it is.
>
> I'll concede that there's a difference between an X server that star
On Sat, 18 Mar 2000, David Morgan wrote:
> Has anyone else had problems with XFree 4 and Netscape 4.x? It keeps getting
> a bus error on launch. Anyone find a work around? I know, I know... X 4
> isn't supported but I might as well ask anyway.
mozilla works - you might want to try that.
There's
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, kapil wrote:
> I want to allow all of my users to ftp into my server from remote location
> but deny some of the users to telnet to my server. If I will change the
> shell of any of the user from "/bin/bash" to "/bin/false" or
> "/usr/bin/passwd" then both ftp as well as tene
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, kapil wrote:
> How to configure my linux server (redhat linux 6.1) to have 12 virtual
> consoles.
Add to /etc/inittab:
7:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty7
8:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty8
9:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty9
10:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty10
11:2345:respaw
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
> Today I tried to telnet to one of my servers that is normaly very fast.
> And it took forever to get a login prompt. What could be the problem?
A lot of things are possible... including:
- reverse DNS lookup for your client's IP not working
- someon
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Patrick May wrote:
> This might be a little OT here, but does anyone have any idea where such a
> monster could be found? If you have it, know where it is, etc. I'm sure much
> praise will be bestowed upon you by the users of licq 0.80. It came out
> yesterday and is built ag
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Brandon Dorman wrote:
> http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/story/story_4608.html
>
> lets vote guys!
Unfortunately the same message seems to have arrived at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as well - I can't believe 28% of the
population are THAT stupid. ;)
LLaP
bero
--
To unsubscribe:
1 - 100 of 388 matches
Mail list logo
