efax and lpr don't play nice

2000-04-04 Thread John Summerfield
I have these computers; emu much updated RHL 5.0; it has my modem and hosts home directories etc. possum RHL 6.1 plus all relevant 6.1 updates plus a few bits of 6.2 that have squeezed through my modem. Both have efax 0.9; emu has efax-0.9-4. emu has the recently-released lpr update: lpr-0

RH 6.2beta to rawhide 20000327 upgrade report

2000-04-04 Thread Christopher McCrory
Hello... I tried a 6.2beta -->> rawhide upgrade. It went smooth mostly. On the intel machine it was using a tulip card with old_tulip as the module. After the upgrade old_tulip didn't exist so no network until I manually changed it. kudzu update? On the sparc a similar situation.

Re: RH 6.2beta to rawhide 20000327 upgrade report

2000-04-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Christopher McCrory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > I tried a 6.2beta -->> rawhide upgrade. It went smooth mostly. > On the intel machine it was using a tulip card with old_tulip as the > module. After the upgrade old_tulip didn't exist so no network until I > manually changed it. kudzu up

rawhide XFree86 SRPM vs RPM?

2000-04-04 Thread Svante Signell
In the latest rawhide 2000-03-27, the XFree86.src.rpm version is 4.0-0.2 while the RPMS are version 3.3.6-20. Should the .src.rpm still be 3.3.6? What about supplying both 3.3.6 and 4.0? BTW: The 4.0 version does not compile for me, 3.3.6-20 (from 6.2) does. Nice to see kernel-2.3.99, emacs

Dependencies of rpm and popt?

2000-04-04 Thread Svante Signell
rpm-3.0.4-7.src.rpm depends on popt >= 1.5. The problem is that popt is built by the rpm packege itself. Circular dependencies!! A popt package is present in the rawhide SRPMS directory but that version is 1.4!! These comments also applies to 6.2 (i.e. zoot). -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscri

Re: rawhide XFree86 SRPM vs RPM?

2000-04-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Svante Signell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > In the latest rawhide 2000-03-27, the XFree86.src.rpm version is > 4.0-0.2 while the RPMS are version 3.3.6-20. ... snip ... > BTW: The 4.0 version does not compile for me You have your answer. ;) Source RPMs that actually compile should be in the ne

X server problem on RedHat6.1 installation

2000-04-04 Thread DANG, Muoi
Hi all, I recently install RedHat 6.1 on my Pentium 120, 16MB memory, 6.4 GB HD. It stalled OK and installation can detect my video card ET6000 and set my monitor to SVGA OK. When I start X server by typing command startx, it produces a following error: Xauth: creating new authority file /ro