Chris Kloiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Could it be related to this bug?
> >
> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17830
>
> Same card, yes. But kudzu lives in the bootnet.img floppy?
The pcitable that lists the mappings from PCI ids to drivers
does, and it comes from kud
Chris Kloiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > BTW- I have a tulip network card (LinkSys LNE100TX version 2.0 - the
> > > good one) that is not only not detected by the RawHide bootnet.img, but
> > > there is no choice for a tulip module on either the boot.img nor
> > > drivers.img (there is an ol
Dax Kelson wrote:
>
> Chris Kloiber said once upon a time (Tue, 19 Dec 2000):
>
> > BTW- I have a tulip network card (LinkSys LNE100TX version 2.0 - the
> > good one) that is not only not detected by the RawHide bootnet.img, but
> > there is no choice for a tulip module on either the boot.img no
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> Chris Kloiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Is the current incarnation of RawHide one of the "not going to install"
> > kind?
>
> Very possibly. The Rawhide installer definitely falls into the
> 'not even given a *hint* of QA' category.
Ok. I can live with that.
> >
Chris Kloiber said once upon a time (Tue, 19 Dec 2000):
> BTW- I have a tulip network card (LinkSys LNE100TX version 2.0 - the
> good one) that is not only not detected by the RawHide bootnet.img, but
> there is no choice for a tulip module on either the boot.img nor
> drivers.img (there is an ol
Chris Kloiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Is the current incarnation of RawHide one of the "not going to install"
> kind?
Very possibly. The Rawhide installer definitely falls into the
'not even given a *hint* of QA' category.
> I am unable to trick it into a had drive install (can't find CD im
Is the current incarnation of RawHide one of the "not going to install"
kind?
I am unable to trick it into a had drive install (can't find CD image)
and I am also unable to get it to do an FTP install (finds CD image, but
Sig 11's on loading anaconda) I know what Sig-11 is, and I know it's not
RA
Edward S. Marshall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Looks like kernel24-2.4.0-0.43.4.src.rpm didn't appear in SRPMS for this
> week's update...or am I missing something? :-)
Bugger. Will fix.
Bill
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
Hi,
Looks like kernel24-2.4.0-0.43.4.src.rpm didn't appear in SRPMS for this
week's update...or am I missing something? :-)
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/ Mercantec, Inc.
___
