Chris Kloiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Is the current incarnation of RawHide one of the "not going to install"
> kind?
Very possibly. The Rawhide installer definitely falls into the
'not even given a *hint* of QA' category.
> I am unable to trick it into a had drive install (can't find CD image)
The hard drive install is now changed so that it just looks for the
two ISO images in a directory.
> and I am also unable to get it to do an FTP install (finds CD image, but
> Sig 11's on loading anaconda)
kudzu bug, since fixed, IIRC.
> fit on one CD, and splitting them up without any hints (how about adding
> a field in the comps list to tell the installer (and users) what cd a
> package is on) is extremely difficult seeing as I don't have original
> cd's to go by as a guide.
There's not a CD requirement; things can be on any CD. It's just that
if you mix and match too much, you'll end up swapping CDs a lot.
> BTW- I have a tulip network card (LinkSys LNE100TX version 2.0 - the
> good one) that is not only not detected by the RawHide bootnet.img, but
> there is no choice for a tulip module on either the boot.img nor
> drivers.img (there is an old_tulip, but it is not the right module).
lspci -vn output for the card?
Bill
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
