Re: 2nd try: python 2.0

2000-11-28 Thread Tony Seward
On 28 Nov 2000, Thilo Mezger wrote: > Tony Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to start using the Unicode support but I can deal without it for > > now. Same for list comprehensions. > > Install Python 2.0 in /usr/local and call it with > >

Re: 2nd try: python 2.0

2000-11-27 Thread Thilo Mezger
Tony Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to start using the Unicode support but I can deal without it for > now. Same for list comprehensions. Install Python 2.0 in /usr/local and call it with #!/usr/bin/env python2 or something like this. I just have to agr

Re: 2nd try: python 2.0

2000-11-27 Thread Tony Seward
ython 2.0 or distutils compiled for 1.5. Other modules are also starting to require distutils. If Python 2.0 will soon appear in rawhide, then I'll wait for it to show up and try to help work out the kinks. Otherwise, I'll make a bugzilla request for the distutils module to be inc

Re: 2nd try: python 2.0

2000-11-27 Thread Matt Wilson
he first time. > > Is there a timetable for moving to python 2.0 in rawhide? Are there any > outstanding compatibility issues that need to be resolved first? ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/m

2nd try: python 2.0

2000-11-27 Thread Tony Seward
I'm reposting because I didn't get a response the first time. Is there a timetable for moving to python 2.0 in rawhide? Are there any outstanding compatibility issues that need to be resolved first? Tony ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing l

python 2.0

2000-11-18 Thread Tony Seward
Is there a timetable for moving to python 2.0 in rawhide? Are there any outstanding compatibility issues? Tony ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list