Re: kernel-2.2.16 source rpm

2000-09-09 Thread Frank Hale
"Mike A. Harris" wrote: > > You can replace the kernel with whatever you like, either a raw > official one, or your own customized one. > > Hope this helps. > Thank you, it helps alot! -- ICQ: 7205161 http://sapphire.sourceforge.net - Yet another X11 Window Manager ___

Re: kernel-2.2.16 source rpm

2000-09-08 Thread John Summerfield
> I downloaded the kernel-2.2.16 source rpm. I noticed a > number of patches in there. What are these patches > for? Are they RH specific. What would be the harm in > just packaging the kernel source tarball by itself. > I've never had the need to patch the kernel with any &

Re: kernel-2.2.16 source rpm

2000-09-07 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Frank Hale wrote: >Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 08:22:54 -0700 (PDT) >From: Frank Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Subject: kernel-2.2.16 source rpm > >I downloaded the kernel-2.2.16 source

Re: kernel-2.2.16 source rpm

2000-09-07 Thread Panu Matilainen
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Frank Hale wrote: > I downloaded the kernel-2.2.16 source rpm. I noticed a > number of patches in there. What are these patches > for? Are they RH specific. What would be the harm in > just packaging the kernel source tarball by itself. > I've never had t

kernel-2.2.16 source rpm

2000-09-07 Thread Frank Hale
I downloaded the kernel-2.2.16 source rpm. I noticed a number of patches in there. What are these patches for? Are they RH specific. What would be the harm in just packaging the kernel source tarball by itself. I've never had the need to patch the kernel with any nonstandard patches.