John Summerfield said once upon a time (Sat, 6 Jan 2001):
> Ask yourself what you expect to achieve.
>
> If it's better performance, sorry, you won't get back the time spent
> rebuilding it. If you have the space capacity to rebuild the package you
[snip]
I've taken the latest glibc errata SRPM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> So i would like to rebuild glibc-2.2-9.src.rpm for i686 and with 2.4
> optimisation like precise in a mail from Bill Notthingham @ RedHat:
Ask yourself what you expect to achieve.
If it's better performance, sorry, you won't get back the time spent
rebuilding it. If
Chris Kloiber wrote:
>
> "redhat.angus" wrote:
> >
> > preview directory of CD2 of RedHat 7.0 include a glibc package which is
> > optimized for 2.4 and i686 architecture.
> > I run actually the official 2.4.0 on my redhat 7.0 fully up2date (very
> > happy, any functioning).
> > So i would like t
"redhat.angus" wrote:
>
> preview directory of CD2 of RedHat 7.0 include a glibc package which is
> optimized for 2.4 and i686 architecture.
> I run actually the official 2.4.0 on my redhat 7.0 fully up2date (very
> happy, any functioning).
> So i would like to rebuild glibc-2.2-9.src.rpm for i68
preview directory of CD2 of RedHat 7.0 include a glibc package which is
optimized for 2.4 and i686 architecture.
I run actually the official 2.4.0 on my redhat 7.0 fully up2date (very
happy, any functioning).
So i would like to rebuild glibc-2.2-9.src.rpm for i686 and with 2.4
optimisation like
