> > No journalling fs is in 2.3.x or likely to be in 2.4
> When is it likely to be incorporated?
In the real kernel tree - 2.5.x
Expect vendors to ship stuff before then though.
> > ext3 is at ftp.linux.org.uk:/pub/linux/sct
>
> This?
> ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/sct/fs/ext3-0.0.2c.tar.g
> > Where is ext3? It does not show up on my filesystem list (2.3.47). Nor can
> > I see it at ftp.au.kernel.org
>
> No journalling fs is in 2.3.x or likely to be in 2.4
When is it likely to be incorporated?
>
> ext3 is at ftp.linux.org.uk:/pub/linux/sct
This?
ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/lin
> Where is ext3? It does not show up on my filesystem list (2.3.47). Nor can
> I see it at ftp.au.kernel.org
No journalling fs is in 2.3.x or likely to be in 2.4
ext3 is at ftp.linux.org.uk:/pub/linux/sct
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
> > and IBM's porting its jfs to Linux; I don't know just how far along it is,
>
> ext3 works, tested on Linux
>
> > but id does have enough to brag about. As it's proven technology (comes
> > from AIX and is also used on OS/2) I expect the work to be done reasonably
> > quickly.
>
> Work ma
> I see ext3, coda, reiserfs, gfs, but I don't know what is the "priority"
> list (sorted by stableness, good design, features).
The all solve different problems.
GFS is a shared disk fs
Reiserfs is designed for performance and to handle small files well and
journalled
ext3 is format com
Alan Cox wrote:
> > but id does have enough to brag about. As it's proven technology (comes
> > from AIX and is also used on OS/2) I expect the work to be done reasonably
> > quickly.
>
> Work maybe, but its not proven until it works for a while under load under
> Linux. That will take time. ext3
> and IBM's porting its jfs to Linux; I don't know just how far along it is,
ext3 works, tested on Linux
> but id does have enough to brag about. As it's proven technology (comes
> from AIX and is also used on OS/2) I expect the work to be done reasonably
> quickly.
Work maybe, but its not p
> > My question is how can I get around this manual intervention in the field.
> > Should I replace the logic where "sulogin" gets called with my own logic?
> > What is the best way to do this? There will be no keyboard attached to the
> > system.
>
> #2. Get the ext3fs journalling beta and test i
> My question is how can I get around this manual intervention in the field.
> Should I replace the logic where "sulogin" gets called with my own logic?
> What is the best way to do this? There will be no keyboard attached to the
> system.
Two answers here;
#1. Bypass the logic and always force
Hello,
We have several Red Hat Linux 6.0 systems deployed in the field. The OS is
installed on a Calluna PCMCIA hard drive. Very frequently, when the system
has been previously powered off without halting it correclty, it will boot
boot up and stop with file system error and require manual inter
10 matches
Mail list logo
