> Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Freivald, Joseph A, GOVMK wrote:
> >
> > > I thought one of the other things about Mandrake is they included
> > > non-exportable encryption, which is not an option for RedHat. No?
> >
> > No, since they're based i
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Freivald, Joseph A, GOVMK wrote:
>
> > I thought one of the other things about Mandrake is they included
> > non-exportable encryption, which is not an option for RedHat. No?
>
> No, since they're based in France, they'r
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Freivald, Joseph A, GOVMK wrote:
> I thought one of the other things about Mandrake is they included
> non-exportable encryption, which is not an option for RedHat. No?
No, since they're based in France, they're bound to even more ridiculous
export restrictions.
LLaP
bero
D]
> Subject: Re: custom dist based on Redhat
>
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Frank Hale wrote:
>
> >> Absolutely. That is why I recommend _against_ doing
> >> carte
> >> blanche search and replace
> >> 's/[Rr]ed.*[Hh]at/whatever/g' on
>
> Sorry if it seemed I
> was implying
> that you were up to no good, but that wasn't my
> intention. I was
> merely pointing out that others have done so IMHO
> and I think it
> is tasteless and unethical despite the GPL freebie
> status of
> everything.
>
I didn't think you were.
Frank
===
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Frank Hale wrote:
>> Absolutely. That is why I recommend _against_ doing
>> carte
>> blanche search and replace
>> 's/[Rr]ed.*[Hh]at/whatever/g' on
>> things. There is no point other than to try and
>> strip Red Hat of
>> credit due, and in the process destroy copyright
>>
> Absolutely. That is why I recommend _against_ doing
> carte
> blanche search and replace
> 's/[Rr]ed.*[Hh]at/whatever/g' on
> things. There is no point other than to try and
> strip Red Hat of
> credit due, and in the process destroy copyright
> notices, and
> set one's self up for possible le
> An overview of Red Hat's trademarks and their usage,
> see:
>
>
http://www.redhat.com/about/trademark_guidelines.html
>
Thanks everyone for the helpful information, I will
take this into credit when I go about building my
distribution.
Thank you,
Frank
=
ICQ: 7205161
http://sapphire.so
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Matt Wilson wrote:
>Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 00:23:07 -0400
>From: Matt Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: Re: custom dist based on Redhat
>
>Copyright law is fairly clear h
Copyright law is fairly clear here. You *must not* remove
"Copyright Red Hat, Inc." from copyright statements. You may
append to copyright statements if significant changes have been made
to the source code that warrant copyright protection, and you choose
to claim copyright on those change
Hi,
I guess you could also say something like "FooLinux based on RedHat
Linux x.x" in the installer.
-atul
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Frank Hale wrote:
>I am making my own linux distribution based on Redhat 6.2. I would like
>to supply my dist name wherever Redhats comes up (ie installer, boot
>sequence, etc...) I would like to give them credit in a file on my
>CD-ROM. Can somebody give me some information
I am making my own linux distribution based on Redhat 6.2. I would like
to supply my dist name wherever Redhats comes up (ie installer, boot
sequence, etc...) I would like to give them credit in a file on my
CD-ROM. Can somebody give me some information on how to properly go
about giving Redhat cr
13 matches
Mail list logo
