Heh, ok, serves me right for complaining. Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: How to get RedHat 8.0 to allow core dump files
> On Fri, Dec 13,
D]>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: How to get RedHat 8.0 to allow core dump files
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:55:17 -0600
> "Dan Winslow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I just would like to say, that this is an extremely ill-thought out
>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:55:17AM -0600, Dan Winslow wrote:
> I just would like to say, that this is an extremely ill-thought out change.
> It's a change to basic behavior thats been in place for years and years, and
> makes core files even MORE problematic for disk space as they don't
> overwrite
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:55:17 -0600
"Dan Winslow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just would like to say, that this is an extremely ill-thought out
> change. It's a change to basic behavior thats been in place for years
...that I'm thankful for.
> and years, and makes core files even MORE problema
change? If
RedHat came up with this, I think they are being extremely foolish.
- Original Message -
From: "Jag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: How to get RedHat 8.0 to allow core dump files
> On Th
*blink* *blink*
Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: "Binand Raj S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: How to get RedHat 8.0 to allow core dump files
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:48:19PM
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:48:19PM -0600, Dan Winslow wrote:
> core file size(blocks, -c) unlimited
> This is in the current shell I am running programs from. It will not produce
> a core dump file. The fault says :
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> So its trying to d
from. It will not produce
a core dump file. The fault says :
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
So its trying to dump, but.no file.
- Original Message -
From: "Jag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: How
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 18:54, Dan Winslow wrote:
> Platform is a fresh install of RedHat 8.0. I have
> ulimit -c unlimited
> in /etc/profile. I have write perms to the current dir. A test program
> compiled with gcc that does a 'strcpy(0,0)' seg faults but does not
> cor
Platform is a
fresh install of RedHat 8.0. I haveulimit -c unlimitedin /etc/profile. I
have write perms to the current dir. A test programcompiled with gcc that
does a 'strcpy(0,0)' seg faults but does not coredump. I have searched all
day on the web, finding nothing but ulimitsettings. Any
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Vimol wrote:
> The C program here is giving out "Hello world" while running in Rethat Linux
> 7.2 . It is compiled with ''gcc".
>
> WHY NO CORE DUMP??? I have malloc only one byte.
> Please explain me.
We've seen quite a fe
Hi !
malloc() never allocates just one byte, it depends on the implementation,
but you get at least 4 bytes to use maybe 8 or more so there is room for
that number of bytes.
And even if you do overwrite the end, you may not get a core dump, a normal
C app runs in a single segment and writing
g-fault(and hence no core dump).
Quoting Vimol ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The C program here is giving out "Hello world" while running in Rethat Linux
> 7.2 . It is compiled with ''gcc".
>
> WHY NO CORE DUMP??? I have
The C program here is giving out "Hello world" while running in Rethat Linux
7.2 . It is compiled with ''gcc".
WHY NO CORE DUMP??? I have malloc only one byte.
Please explain me.
Kvimol
#include
#include
void
my_strcat(char *dest, const char *src)
{
while
Rpm has started acting strange.
I haven't changed anything.
# rpm -q rpm
rpm-4.0.2-7x
#rpm -qa |grep anaconda
anaconda-7.0.1-6
rpmq: header.c:511: headerLoad: Assertion `rdlen == dl' failed.
Abort (core dumped)
# rpm --rebuilddb
rpmq: header.c:511: headerLoad: Assertion `rdlen == dl' failed.
A
I am writing a program that calls a dynamic library (which I am also
writing) via dlopen and family. So far, everything has been working just
fine. I have a need for posix threading, semaphores, and mutexes in my
dynamic library. As soon as I add the -lpthread switch to my gcc command
for the d
16 matches
Mail list logo
