On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:55:17 -0600 "Dan Winslow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just would like to say, that this is an extremely ill-thought out > change. It's a change to basic behavior thats been in place for years ...that I'm thankful for. > and years, and makes core files even MORE problematic for disk space > as they don't overwrite each other. Is this a ReddHat change, or a > linux kernel change? If RedHat came up with this, I think they are > being extremely foolish. They are making core files for threaded programs useful. One hopes that in the future Linux threads will be able to share a core file and gdb will be able to cope, but at least this way a core file from a threaded program might actually show you the stack trace of the thread that died instead of the last thread to exit normally. Doug -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
