From: John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 08:10:11 +0800
> > Does anyone know why ispell had to be replaced with aspell in the
> > RedHat Linux 7.x releases?
>
> Probably because it's better. I personally made the switch before RH di
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 06:35, Akop Pogosian wrote:
> Does anyone know why ispell had to be replaced with aspell in the
> RedHat Linux 7.x releases?
Probably because it's better. I personally made the switch before RH did.
The compatibility issue is another matter, and something
Please excuse me if I am posting this rant to a wrong mailing list.
Does anyone know why ispell had to be replaced with aspell in the
RedHat Linux 7.x releases? Aspell's "ispell" compatibility program
completely messes up the keys that ispell users have come to depend
on, an
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Two short (maybe dump) questions:
> >
> > 1.) Has ever anybody of you managed to let aspell work
> > properly with emacs in "pinstripe" (what's the reason
> > anyway to change aspell for ispell)
> BS"D
>
> Hi,
>
> Two short (maybe dump) questions:
>
> 1.) Has ever anybody of you managed to let aspell work
> properly with emacs in "pinstripe" (what's the reason
> anyway to change aspell for ispell)?
>
I used aspell for a while an
) questions:
>
> 1.) Has ever anybody of you managed to let aspell work
> properly with emacs in "pinstripe" (what's the reason
> anyway to change aspell for ispell)?
>
> 2.) When will there be a final Red Hat 7.0?
>
> Thanx in advance!
>
> Daniel.
>
BS"D
Hi,
Two short (maybe dump) questions:
1.) Has ever anybody of you managed to let aspell work
properly with emacs in "pinstripe" (what's the reason
anyway to change aspell for ispell)?
2.) When will there be a final Red Hat 7.0?
Thanx
After installation of pspell-0.11.1-1, which aspell-0.32.1-1 depends on
according to the .spec file,
Requires: pspell >= 0.11.1
Buildrequires: pspell-devel >= 0.11.1
aspell refuses to reinstall.
rpm -Uvh .../aspell-0.32.1-1.i686.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
libpspell-impl.s
