On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > In the xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/memory.c
> > the mem_map_reserve function calling is the "old" style,
> Your patch introduces a new bug...
Yes, You've right, sorry, I'm really tired :)
--
Ciao:
Fonya
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Akos Szabo wrote:
> In the xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/memory.c
> the mem_map_reserve function calling is the "old" style,
Your patch introduces a new bug...
This chunk:
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= 0x020400
+/*
So I make a little pach for compiling without error messages.
Sorry for poor English, I'm very tyred...
--
Ciao:
Fonya
Computers are like airconditioners:
They stop working properly if you open windows.
XFree86-4.0.1-memory_240t10_kernel.patch.bz2
On 30 Sep 2000, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Evandro Fernandes Giovanini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > my question is: where are the servers for XFree86 4.0.1 (what package)?
>
> XFree86-4.0.1-something.rpm
The old XFree had one server binary for each chipset. Th
Evandro Fernandes Giovanini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> my question is: where are the servers for XFree86 4.0.1 (what package)?
XFree86-4.0.1-something.rpm
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
41 days, 22 hours, 54 minutes, 16 seconds till we run away
i see that redhat 7.0 uses XFree86 4.0.1 but i also see servers from the
old XFree86 release there.
my question is: where are the servers for XFree86 4.0.1 (what package)?
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Frank Hale wrote:
>Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 21:32:19 -0400
>From: Frank Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm
>
>I just built XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm and eve
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> XFree86 uses a different driver system. Drivers are implemented
> as loadable modules; there is only one server. (Both that server
> and the drivers are in the XFree86 package.)
>
Thank you for breaking that down for me. This is my first time messing
with the new 4.x
Frank Hale ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> I just built XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm and everything went okay. Here
> is a listing of the RPMS it generated. Am I missing something, where are
> the XServer RPMS? For instance I don't see a MACH_64 XServer which I
> need to run my AT
I just built XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm and everything went okay. Here
is a listing of the RPMS it generated. Am I missing something, where are
the XServer RPMS? For instance I don't see a MACH_64 XServer which I
need to run my ATI card. Hopefully there is a logical explanation.
-rw-rw-r--
Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and
> > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing.
> > > And the Mesa and XFree packages list it as a dependency.
> >
> > They shouldn'
non-ia64, and it should be
> >
> > That file is in there.
> >
> > I'll try rebuilding it with my current /usr/X11* hidden,
> > but It shouldn't see any thing in there should it?
> >
> > I'm not sure how the find-deps stuff works and XFree
I forgot to add this log :(
-Thoams
Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and
> > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing.
> > > And the Mesa and XFree package
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and
> > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing.
> > And the Mesa and XFree packages list it as a dependency.
>
> They shouldn't - is this explicitly, or did it ju
Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote:
> > > This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file -
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :)
>
> I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.
Matt Wilson wrote:
>
> That file is now in the Xconfigurator package.
>
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote:
> > This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file -
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :)
I built this with r
Jose Romildo Malaquias wrote:
>
> I am willing to use XFree86-4.0.1 but there is not
> (or I was not able to find) any RPM packages (that
> includes the goods by Red Hat) for RH Linux 6.2.
> I would like to try the ones from RawHide, but
> they seem not to work. The
When I upgraded to the latest rawhide only Xconfigurator works. I was
previously using
NVIDIA_GLX and NVIDIA_KERNEL rpms to use the 2d nvidia driver but now I
can't load any modules. When I went back to XFree86-4.0-0.30 I still
couldn't load any modules and all the keywords in the xf86config
ge
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:41:42PM -0400, Matt Wilson wrote:
> That file is now in the Xconfigurator package.
Speaking of which, Xconfigurator.spec and anaconda.spec omit to require
that a recent version of kudzu-devel be installed (with 0.36 you get
errors like 'CLASS_MONITOR undeclared'). With
That file is now in the Xconfigurator package.
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote:
>
> Welcome :)
> This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file -
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :)
>
>
> --
> Piotr "Charvel"
On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, James M. Rogers wrote:
>Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 09:22:06 -0700
>From: James M. Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: XFree86-4.0.1 and Red Hat Linux 6.2
>
>You don't need an RPM for XFree 4.0
Right, but this is RedHat Li
Welcome :)
This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file -
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :)
--
Piotr "Charvel" Majka | PGP & GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Uin: 20873695
GCM d- s-:- a-- C++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+ N+++ !o !K w--- !O M V- PS+ PE
grade.
Good Luck!
Jose Romildo Malaquias wrote:
>
> I am willing to use XFree86-4.0.1 but there is not
> (or I was not able to find) any RPM packages (that
> includes the goods by Red Hat) for RH Linux 6.2.
> I would like to try the ones from RawHide, but
> they seem not to work
I am willing to use XFree86-4.0.1 but there is not
(or I was not able to find) any RPM packages (that
includes the goods by Red Hat) for RH Linux 6.2.
I would like to try the ones from RawHide, but
they seem not to work. There are unsatisfied
dependencies which relates only to RawHide.
Has
24 matches
Mail list logo