Re: [Patch] For XFree86-4.0.1 and linux kernel 2.4.0 > test6

2000-11-15 Thread Akos Szabo
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > > In the xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/memory.c > > the mem_map_reserve function calling is the "old" style, > Your patch introduces a new bug... Yes, You've right, sorry, I'm really tired :) -- Ciao: Fonya

Re: [Patch] For XFree86-4.0.1 and linux kernel 2.4.0 > test6

2000-11-15 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Akos Szabo wrote: > In the xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/memory.c > the mem_map_reserve function calling is the "old" style, Your patch introduces a new bug... This chunk: +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= 0x020400 +/*

[Patch] For XFree86-4.0.1 and linux kernel 2.4.0 > test6

2000-11-15 Thread Akos Szabo
So I make a little pach for compiling without error messages. Sorry for poor English, I'm very tyred... -- Ciao: Fonya Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open windows. XFree86-4.0.1-memory_240t10_kernel.patch.bz2

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 servers

2000-09-30 Thread Thornton Prime
On 30 Sep 2000, Alan Shutko wrote: > Evandro Fernandes Giovanini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > my question is: where are the servers for XFree86 4.0.1 (what package)? > > XFree86-4.0.1-something.rpm The old XFree had one server binary for each chipset. Th

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 servers

2000-09-30 Thread Alan Shutko
Evandro Fernandes Giovanini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > my question is: where are the servers for XFree86 4.0.1 (what package)? XFree86-4.0.1-something.rpm -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors! 41 days, 22 hours, 54 minutes, 16 seconds till we run away

XFree86 4.0.1 servers

2000-09-30 Thread Evandro Fernandes Giovanini
i see that redhat 7.0 uses XFree86 4.0.1 but i also see servers from the old XFree86 release there. my question is: where are the servers for XFree86 4.0.1 (what package)? ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm

2000-09-05 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Frank Hale wrote: >Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 21:32:19 -0400 >From: Frank Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Subject: XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm > >I just built XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm and eve

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm

2000-09-05 Thread Frank Hale
Bill Nottingham wrote: > > XFree86 uses a different driver system. Drivers are implemented > as loadable modules; there is only one server. (Both that server > and the drivers are in the XFree86 package.) > Thank you for breaking that down for me. This is my first time messing with the new 4.x

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm

2000-09-05 Thread Bill Nottingham
Frank Hale ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > I just built XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm and everything went okay. Here > is a listing of the RPMS it generated. Am I missing something, where are > the XServer RPMS? For instance I don't see a MACH_64 XServer which I > need to run my AT

XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm

2000-09-05 Thread Frank Hale
I just built XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm and everything went okay. Here is a listing of the RPMS it generated. Am I missing something, where are the XServer RPMS? For instance I don't see a MACH_64 XServer which I need to run my ATI card. Hopefully there is a logical explanation. -rw-rw-r--

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-14 Thread Thomas Dodd
Thomas Dodd wrote: > > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and > > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing. > > > And the Mesa and XFree packages list it as a dependency. > > > > They shouldn'

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-14 Thread Thomas Dodd
non-ia64, and it should be > > > > That file is in there. > > > > I'll try rebuilding it with my current /usr/X11* hidden, > > but It shouldn't see any thing in there should it? > > > > I'm not sure how the find-deps stuff works and XFree

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-14 Thread Thomas Dodd
I forgot to add this log :( -Thoams Thomas Dodd wrote: > > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and > > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing. > > > And the Mesa and XFree package

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-14 Thread Thomas Dodd
Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing. > > And the Mesa and XFree packages list it as a dependency. > > They shouldn't - is this explicitly, or did it ju

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-14 Thread Bill Nottingham
Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote: > > > This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file - > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :) > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-14 Thread Thomas Dodd
Matt Wilson wrote: > > That file is now in the Xconfigurator package. > > On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote: > > This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file - > > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :) I built this with r

Re: XFree86-4.0.1 and Red Hat Linux 6.2

2000-07-10 Thread Thomas Dodd
Jose Romildo Malaquias wrote: > > I am willing to use XFree86-4.0.1 but there is not > (or I was not able to find) any RPM packages (that > includes the goods by Red Hat) for RH Linux 6.2. > I would like to try the ones from RawHide, but > they seem not to work. The

Re: XFree86-4.0.1

2000-07-10 Thread kmb
When I upgraded to the latest rawhide only Xconfigurator works. I was previously using NVIDIA_GLX and NVIDIA_KERNEL rpms to use the 2d nvidia driver but now I can't load any modules. When I went back to XFree86-4.0-0.30 I still couldn't load any modules and all the keywords in the xf86config ge

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-09 Thread Rudi Chiarito
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:41:42PM -0400, Matt Wilson wrote: > That file is now in the Xconfigurator package. Speaking of which, Xconfigurator.spec and anaconda.spec omit to require that a recent version of kudzu-devel be installed (with 0.36 you get errors like 'CLASS_MONITOR undeclared'). With

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-09 Thread Matt Wilson
That file is now in the Xconfigurator package. On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote: > > Welcome :) > This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file - > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :) > > > -- > Piotr "Charvel"

Re: XFree86-4.0.1 and Red Hat Linux 6.2

2000-07-09 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, James M. Rogers wrote: >Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 09:22:06 -0700 >From: James M. Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: XFree86-4.0.1 and Red Hat Linux 6.2 > >You don't need an RPM for XFree 4.0 Right, but this is RedHat Li

XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-09 Thread Piotr Majka
Welcome :) This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file - /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :) -- Piotr "Charvel" Majka | PGP & GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Uin: 20873695 GCM d- s-:- a-- C++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+ N+++ !o !K w--- !O M V- PS+ PE

Re: XFree86-4.0.1 and Red Hat Linux 6.2

2000-07-08 Thread James M. Rogers
grade. Good Luck! Jose Romildo Malaquias wrote: > > I am willing to use XFree86-4.0.1 but there is not > (or I was not able to find) any RPM packages (that > includes the goods by Red Hat) for RH Linux 6.2. > I would like to try the ones from RawHide, but > they seem not to work

XFree86-4.0.1 and Red Hat Linux 6.2

2000-07-08 Thread Jose Romildo Malaquias
I am willing to use XFree86-4.0.1 but there is not (or I was not able to find) any RPM packages (that includes the goods by Red Hat) for RH Linux 6.2. I would like to try the ones from RawHide, but they seem not to work. There are unsatisfied dependencies which relates only to RawHide. Has