[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> True. We should all switch to Windows... ;-)
> Responses like the above are so weird and surprising. What can you be
> thinking when you make statements like that? Or are you just reacting,
> without thinking?
It's fairly clear that a good number of people are in fact
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:08:14AM -0600, Christopher Abbey wrote:
> Yesterday, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > *) including on that page, the email addresses for the Red Hat
> > developers responsible for particular portions of the distribution, so that
> > people can communicate with them direc
Mario Torre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, I think it is right to post message here such as "Corel WordPerfect
> doesn't work in RedHat Linux 7, why? It's a bug or I'm missing something?",
> etc.. cause that is stricly related to the development.
No, it's much better to post to one of t
On Thursday 04 January 2001 21:24, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Mario Torre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > But RedHat doesn't want from anyone to contribute to its distro.
>
> We don't?
>
> That's the first I've heard of it.
>
> Bill
>
Well, don't misunderstand me...
What I'm saying is not that RedHa
Yesterday, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:55:36PM -0500, Matt Wilson wrote:
> > What I'd like to encourage is for people to come to redhat-devel-list
> > to make comments, suggestions, complaints, and even patches to the
> > core Red Hat Linux distribution. If you have a pe
I posted my last message before seeing this one...
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:55:36PM -0500, Matt Wilson wrote:
> What I'd like to encourage is for people to come to redhat-devel-list
> to make comments, suggestions, complaints, and even patches to the
> core Red Hat Linux distribution. If you h
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:18:39AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Ok, most of the people who read Kernel Traffic, have already seen
> > this, but I think this comment of Zack Brown in Issue #100 is worth
> > repeating here:
>
> So Zack Brown's an expert on how Re
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 12:48:36PM -0800, Thornton Prime wrote:
>
> I'm not disputing your claim though Bill. I think RedHat is very proactive
> about getting developer import by making rawhide available and having a
> public bugzilla. I would like to see the contrib program resurrected and
> mad
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Mario Torre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > But RedHat doesn't want from anyone to contribute to its distro.
>
> We don't?
>
> That's the first I've heard of it.
What is the current status of the contrib program. I haven't heard
anything from the maili
Mario Torre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> But RedHat doesn't want from anyone to contribute to its distro.
We don't?
That's the first I've heard of it.
Bill
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/list
On Thursday 04 January 2001 19:18, John Summerfield wrote:
> So Zack Brown's an expert on how Red Hat should do its business?
I don't think the question could be answered only in this way...
The fact that RedHat it's colser that Debian or the other distros is true.
That's not necessarily bad.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Ok, most of the people who read Kernel Traffic, have already seen
> this, but I think this comment of Zack Brown in Issue #100 is worth
> repeating here:
So Zack Brown's an expert on how Red Hat should do its business?
Seems to me that RH has got one or two things rig
On Thursday 04 January 2001 11:40, you wrote:
>
> The only public developer mailing list suitable for actual Red Hat
> development, for example, tends to stay fairly low traffic and
> off-topic.
I could be a little off here or just tired but I've always thought of this
list for th
Ok, most of the people who read Kernel Traffic, have already seen this,
but I think this comment of Zack Brown in Issue #100 is worth repeating
here:
=
(Zack Brown [*]:
Personally, I think Red Hat is not vocal enough about encouraging
people to participate
14 matches
Mail list logo
