"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> >> > Some programs are just best kept in /dev/null... ;o)
> >>
> >> Yup, and it's landed there - I can't find a copy anywhere anymore.
> >
> >I think it's on my 6 disc PowerTools/archives for Feb 1997.
> >RedHat 4.1 (x86, al
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>> > Some programs are just best kept in /dev/null... ;o)
>>
>> Yup, and it's landed there - I can't find a copy anywhere anymore.
>
>I think it's on my 6 disc PowerTools/archives for Feb 1997.
>RedHat 4.1 (x86, alpha, and Sparc plus FTP archives)
>If anyo
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Matt Wilson wrote:
>Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 09:55:43 -0400
>From: Matt Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: RedHat linux development
>
>s/RedHat/Red Hat/g
;o)
I'm used to typing your directory names on the
CDROM.
/re
Matt Wilson wrote:
>
> s/RedHat/Red Hat/g
>
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 04:59:56AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Matt Wilson wrote:
> > >Red Hat did not develop Red Baron. It was developed by Spyglass
> > >(Spyglass Moasic anyone? :)
> >
> > Hmmm. I wasn't aware of that at
s/RedHat/Red Hat/g
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 04:59:56AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Matt Wilson wrote:
> >Red Hat did not develop Red Baron. It was developed by Spyglass
> >(Spyglass Moasic anyone? :)
>
> Hmmm. I wasn't aware of that at all. I ran it once, said YIKES,
> an
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Matt Wilson wrote:
>> >None of them was developed by us (and we can't pick the licenses other
>> >people choose) - all the stuff we develop ourselves is GPL or LGPL.
>>
>> Right, I knew that, but I knew that RedHat did sell stuff (at
>> least in the past) that was non-GPL, bu
s/RedHat/Red Hat/g
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 12:31:11AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
> Ok, great. I wasn't aware RedHat no longer sold Motif. Also, I
> didn't believe Lesstif or OpenMotif were as compatible. I'm
> assuming that they are and that that is why Motif was dropped?
Lesstif is usef
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>> >ONLY major Linux distribution that releases ALL their software under a GPL
>> >license,
>>
>> For the record, RedHat has software such as Motif,
>
>Not true. We used to have some Motif years ago, before Lesstif got
>anywhere near usable. Righ
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 07:44:33PM +0200, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> SuSE did NOT GPL their installer (It's license basically says "you may
> read the source, but you may not use it in other projects").
> Caldera's installer used to be proprietary; I think they've published the
> source only
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> >ONLY major Linux distribution that releases ALL their software under a GPL
> >license,
>
> For the record, RedHat has software such as Motif,
Not true. We used to have some Motif years ago, before Lesstif got
anywhere near usable. Right now, we have
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, Nitebirdz wrote:
>I wouldn't overlook this licensing issue though. The original poster is
>right that a lot of people are bashing Red Hat for who knows what reason
>but in most cases they're simply beeing deeply unfair. Red Hat is the
I agree with this 100%.
>ONLY major Li
Matt Wilson wrote:
> I'd say that our key areas in heavy development are
---8<--snip
Thanks for the reply, I relayed much of the content to our LUG
group in Sydney Australia and wrote up a little article on our
web site at www.oceania.net.
Hope this sets a few minds straigh
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, Ingo Luetkebohle wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 08:27:38AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is there any devel co-operation with XFree, ALSA ,
> > ReiserFS and other projects?
>
> They are openly supporting gtk and gnome. On top of that, a lot of RedHat
> employees are w
I'd say that our key areas in heavy development are:
* kernel
- raid (Ingo)
- vm (Igno, Ben, sct)
- filesystem work (sct)
- VFS (Al Viro)
- sparc (Jakub Jelinek and Dave Miller)
- networking (Dave Miller, Ingo)
- everything under the sun (Alan Cox. :)
- SCSI (aic7xxx), processor o
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 08:27:38AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any devel co-operation with XFree, ALSA ,
> ReiserFS and other projects?
They are openly supporting gtk and gnome. On top of that, a lot of RedHat
employees are working quite actively on a number of projects (HA comes t
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> eg What devel projects is RH involved with
> Is there any devel co-operation with XFree, ALSA ,
> ReiserFS and other projects?
Well, they are quite involved with gtk+ and GNOME. And they employ Alan
Cox too. I suggest you take a look at http://www.la
I have a query regarding redhats involvement with the open source
community. I ask as there has been quite a bit of RH bashing on
our local LUG mailing list and I thought, why not ask what RH
is doing to further the cause of linux development.
eg What devel projects is RH involved with
Is there an
17 matches
Mail list logo
