"vishist mandapaka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>I am unable to access the linux file system through windows using
> Samba. Here am providing the configuration file that I used. Can any
> one point me what went wrong here.
Please ask on either the samba listm one of the distribution
s
On Fri Mar 29 2002 at 00:04, "vishist mandapaka" wrote:
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
(Please don't use that, turn it off in your outrage excess mailer).
> Hi,
>I am unable to access the linux file system through wind
The rpm post install script move all necesary files to /etc/samba
But you have to backup yoy smb.conf and then move it manually.
The only think I changed was the 'share mem' parameter. I seems that this
parameter does not exists in 2.2.0
Then I read the samba HOWTO from samba.org and changed the '
> If someone want to try this, backup your smb.conf, rpm -ev samba* and then
> install. All configurations now goes to /etc/samba
And how much editing of the configuration is needed once it gets moved
to the right place?
Bob T.
___
Redhat-devel-
Well, I have compiled the src.rpm to make a i686.rpm and installed it
with no problems.
Samba 2.2.0 rocks now.
If someone want to try this, backup your smb.conf, rpm -ev samba* and then
install. Al configurations now goes to /etc/samba
Tested in RH6.2 with all the oficiall updates installed.
Oli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> You have been spoiled. In _real_ operating system you would have
> messages like IEC152I-018.
I have indeed.
A warning to others; to an extent, FJ is pulling a few legs;-)
IEC152I-018 is a coded message, and is followed by some message text that is
often enough
John Summerfield a écrit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Why is it so suprising that m$ products give freaky nonsensical error
> > messages?
>
> I've not noticed that Linux messages are universally the very epitome of
> clarity;-(
>
> ___
> Redhat-devel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Why is it so suprising that m$ products give freaky nonsensical error
> messages?
I've not noticed that Linux messages are universally the very epitome of
clarity;-(
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Please help me on this. Do I need to recompile samba with some misc
> options?
It would be a good start to read the Samba documentation. It describes quite
copiously what is supported and how things might be done.
___
R
On Thu Dec 07 2000 at 19:54, "Alex Sofronie" wrote:
> I have a RH Linux 7.0 with some servers up and running, including Samba
> 2.0.7-21ssl (standard rpm from install). I have w2k pro clients and I want
> to set up RH Linux to be a domain controller. I put that reg in w2k
> registry. With w98 cli
Chris Abbey wrote:
>
> At 17:38 11/8/99 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >The problem is that for DHCP, the configuration can change *at any
> >time*. Unlike BOOTP, where you get a configuration at one point and
> >that's it, with DHCP you need to be able to change at runtime.
>
> Right, I unders
At 17:38 11/8/99 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>The problem is that for DHCP, the configuration can change *at any
>time*. Unlike BOOTP, where you get a configuration at one point and
>that's it, with DHCP you need to be able to change at runtime.
Right, I understand DHCP... actually it can't be
Chris Abbey wrote:
>
> At 15:05 11/8/99 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >This is true, and that's a valid request. Service information exported
> >via DHCP needs to get around.
> >
> >However, something we should think about would be if there is a better
> >way to do this than having pump edit N
At 15:05 11/8/99 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>This is true, and that's a valid request. Service information exported
>via DHCP needs to get around.
>
>However, something we should think about would be if there is a better
>way to do this than having pump edit N different random files in the
>sys
JF Martinez wrote:
> >
> > Isn't this something that should get fixed in Samba, rather than pump?
> >
>
> Yes. But I still would like pump making for Wins servers what it does
> about DNS servers: find them and put the right value in the right
> place. This is DHCP, or Pump work not Samba's
>
> >
> > This is a message for all those people who replied that setting
> > interfaces was not necessary. In fact it is neccessary when you use a
> > Wins server: it seems Samba needs to send its IP address in order to
> > register with the wins server and that for some reason it will not send
>
JF Martinez wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Pump does a magnificent job for people who have to set their
> > networking interfaces throughg DHCP. And it works on Token Rings
> > despite what the doc says about not sure it works on it.
> >
> > Now Samba does not work if I don't add the interfaces=myipnumber
>
>
> Pump does a magnificent job for people who have to set their
> networking interfaces throughg DHCP. And it works on Token Rings
> despite what the doc says about not sure it works on it.
>
> Now Samba does not work if I don't add the interfaces=myipnumber/mask
> parm in the smb.conf and
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, John Summerfield wrote:
> > So for next version it would be real nice if pump was able to handle
> > Samba files (possibly through include files) or at the very least
> > allowed retrieval of the info about interfaces and WINS servers in
> > order for an external program being
>
>
> Pump does a magnificent job for people who have to set their
> networking interfaces throughg DHCP. And it works on Token Rings
> despite what the doc says about not sure it works on it.
>
> Now Samba does not work if I don't add the interfaces=myipnumber/mask
> parm in the smb.conf and
20 matches
Mail list logo
