On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Nikolaos A. Margaritis wrote:
>Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:24:13 +0200
>From: Nikolaos A. Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: pgcc
>
>Pgcc seems to be quite a promissing project. I have noticed they are currently
>using gcc 2.95.3. Is there any possi
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> > At least not anytime soon, because it's not as stable as gcc. It
> > generates broken code occasionally (especially the 2.95.x versions).
> > Besides, the current gcc CVS snapshot has added a new ia32 core that
> > optimizes much better than the previou
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 03:42:53PM +0100, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Nikolaos A. Margaritis wrote:
>
> > Pgcc seems to be quite a promissing project. I have noticed they
> > are currently using gcc 2.95.3. Is there any possibilty that we
> > might some day see pgcc in ra
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Nikolaos A. Margaritis wrote:
> Pgcc seems to be quite a promissing project. I have noticed they are currently
> using gcc 2.95.3. Is there any possibilty that we might some day see pgcc
> in rawhide? If not, why not?
At least not anytime soon, because it's not as stable as
"Nikolaos A. Margaritis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pgcc seems to be quite a promissing project. I have noticed they are
> currently using gcc 2.95.3. Is there any possibilty that we might
> some day see pgcc in rawhide? If not, why not?
AFAIK, pgcc is intended to be a testbed for various opt
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Nikolaos A. Margaritis wrote:
> Pgcc seems to be quite a promissing project. I have noticed they are
> currently using gcc 2.95.3. Is there any possibilty that we might some
> day see pgcc in rawhide? If not, why not?
Pgcc, is a Pentium optimized version. It only targets i
