Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Jag wrote: >> Hopefully. I think I'm going to just start responding with "ask >> on zoot-list", etc.. > >That sort of thing was done a few months back. When someone responded >to help someone, they always prefaced it with saying that this isn't the >proper list for this, bu

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread Jag
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Chris Abbey wrote: > > >At 14:31 10/22/00 -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: > >>The ontopic to offtopic posts are 1:10 respectively. ;o( > > > >perhaps now that we've got a clearer statement of the intent > >of the list that will chan

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Chris Abbey wrote: >At 14:31 10/22/00 -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: >>The ontopic to offtopic posts are 1:10 respectively. ;o( > >perhaps now that we've got a clearer statement of the intent >of the list that will change. Hopefully. I think I'm going to just start respondin

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Discussions in this forum have as much influence on future development >> as any discussion on the beta team mailing list. >> >> So if you have ideas and suggestions, bring 'em on. ;) > >Stanislav has picked up on my brainwaves ;-) > >I think a Red

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread Chris Abbey
At 14:31 10/22/00 -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: >The ontopic to offtopic posts are 1:10 respectively. ;o( perhaps now that we've got a clearer statement of the intent of the list that will change. ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread zbrown
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:42:12AM -0400, Matt Wilson wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 11:32:09AM +0200, Stanislav Meduna wrote: > > > > Zack: there is an invitation-only list that requires > > a NDA for not to leak deadlines and precise content > > of distribution. Looks like this might be the p

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Matt Wilson wrote: >Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 02:37:59 -0400 >From: Matt Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Subject: Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro > >Nope, you're in the

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread Matt Wilson
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 11:32:09AM +0200, Stanislav Meduna wrote: > > Zack: there is an invitation-only list that requires > a NDA for not to leak deadlines and precise content > of distribution. Looks like this might be the place > to monitor/influence the development. I don't know - > I was inv

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread Matt Wilson
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 02:40:30PM +0400, Alex Kanavin wrote: > > Oh, and don't forget forums at http://www.redhat.com/devnet/ If you want a developer at Red Hat to read something, the web forums aren't the place to go at the moment. It's right here. Matt ___

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread Chris Abbey
At 18:59 10/22/00 +0800, John Summerfield wrote: >While there is some ot material there, last time I looked at the list >description (admittedly quite a while ago) the definition of "development" >was >loose enough to include development of programs. Indeed, this is the reason I >originally subsc

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread John Summerfield
> Nope, you're in the right place. There's just a bit of OT > discussion... > While there is some ot material there, last time I looked at the list description (admittedly quite a while ago) the definition of "development" was loose enough to include development of programs. Indeed, this is t

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread Alex Kanavin
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Alex Kanavin wrote: > Well, I think nobody is quite sure what this list is for, but you can > certainly discuss this sort of thing here. And don't forget that most of > the actual development takes place at RH's bugzilla and there's some of > it at www.labs.redhat.com. Oh, a

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread Alex Kanavin
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Zack Brown wrote: > I've been looking for a Red Hat development mailing list, like debian-devel, > where the distro is actually created and improved. It looks like > redhat-devel-list is for people doing development of other projects, on a > running red-hat system. Am I SOL?

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-22 Thread Stanislav Meduna
Hi, > > I've been looking for a Red Hat development mailing list, > > like debian-devel, where the distro is actually created > > and improved. It looks like redhat-devel-list is for people > > doing development of other projects, on a running red-hat > > system. Am I SOL? > > Nope, you're in th

Re: looking for devel list for Red Hat distro

2000-10-21 Thread Matt Wilson
Nope, you're in the right place. There's just a bit of OT discussion... Matt On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 10:23:47PM -0700, Zack Brown wrote: > Hi, > > I've been looking for a Red Hat development mailing list, like debian-devel, > where the distro is actually created and improved. It looks like > r