At 18:59 10/22/00 +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
>While there is some ot material there, last time I looked at the list
>description (admittedly quite a while ago) the definition of "development"
>was
>loose enough to include development of programs. Indeed, this is the reason I
>originally subscribed, and I think my first question related to the
>availability of COBOL compilers.
and actually this is the first time I've seen someone @redhat.com
answer this question. I know when I first saw this list I asked the
same question and never got an answer... I've seen it a few more
times in the last three years. I'm glad to see that statement from
Matt. I know it means some of my questions will be moving off this
list, but it also gives me more confidence that certain others (like
the nfs install tree building script I'm working on) will be directed
somewhere that folks @redhat.com will see.
now the forces of openness
have a powerful and
unexpected new ally
http://ibm.com/linux/
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
