Re: XFree86 4.0.1 servers

2000-09-30 Thread Thornton Prime
On 30 Sep 2000, Alan Shutko wrote: > Evandro Fernandes Giovanini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > my question is: where are the servers for XFree86 4.0.1 (what package)? > > XFree86-4.0.1-something.rpm The old XFree had one server binary for each chipset. The new XFree loads driver libraries

Re: XFree86 4.0.1 servers

2000-09-30 Thread Alan Shutko
Evandro Fernandes Giovanini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > my question is: where are the servers for XFree86 4.0.1 (what package)? XFree86-4.0.1-something.rpm -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors! 41 days, 22 hours, 54 minutes, 16 seconds till we run away. By failing to

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm

2000-09-05 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Frank Hale wrote: >Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 21:32:19 -0400 >From: Frank Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Subject: XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm > >I just built XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm and everything went okay. Here >is

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm

2000-09-05 Thread Frank Hale
Bill Nottingham wrote: > > XFree86 uses a different driver system. Drivers are implemented > as loadable modules; there is only one server. (Both that server > and the drivers are in the XFree86 package.) > Thank you for breaking that down for me. This is my first time messing with the new 4.x

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm

2000-09-05 Thread Bill Nottingham
Frank Hale ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > I just built XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm and everything went okay. Here > is a listing of the RPMS it generated. Am I missing something, where are > the XServer RPMS? For instance I don't see a MACH_64 XServer which I > need to run my ATI card. Hopefully ther

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-14 Thread Thomas Dodd
Thomas Dodd wrote: > > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and > > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing. > > > And the Mesa and XFree packages list it as a dependency. > > > > They shouldn'

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-14 Thread Thomas Dodd
Thomas Dodd wrote: > > I forgot to add this log :( Netscape strikes again! > Thomas Dodd wrote: > > > > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > > > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and > > > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so i

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-14 Thread Thomas Dodd
I forgot to add this log :( -Thoams Thomas Dodd wrote: > > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and > > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing. > > > And the Mesa and XFree package

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-14 Thread Thomas Dodd
Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing. > > And the Mesa and XFree packages list it as a dependency. > > They shouldn't - is this explicitly, or did it ju

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-14 Thread Bill Nottingham
Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote: > > > This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file - > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :) > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and > glibc-2.1.3-15. For s

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-14 Thread Thomas Dodd
Matt Wilson wrote: > > That file is now in the Xconfigurator package. > > On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote: > > This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file - > > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :) I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, an

Re: XFree86-4.0.1 and Red Hat Linux 6.2

2000-07-10 Thread Thomas Dodd
Jose Romildo Malaquias wrote: > > I am willing to use XFree86-4.0.1 but there is not > (or I was not able to find) any RPM packages (that > includes the goods by Red Hat) for RH Linux 6.2. > I would like to try the ones from RawHide, but > they seem not to work. There are unsatisfied > dependenci

Re: XFree86-4.0.1

2000-07-10 Thread kmb
When I upgraded to the latest rawhide only Xconfigurator works. I was previously using NVIDIA_GLX and NVIDIA_KERNEL rpms to use the 2d nvidia driver but now I can't load any modules. When I went back to XFree86-4.0-0.30 I still couldn't load any modules and all the keywords in the xf86config ge

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-09 Thread Rudi Chiarito
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:41:42PM -0400, Matt Wilson wrote: > That file is now in the Xconfigurator package. Speaking of which, Xconfigurator.spec and anaconda.spec omit to require that a recent version of kudzu-devel be installed (with 0.36 you get errors like 'CLASS_MONITOR undeclared'). With

Re: XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

2000-07-09 Thread Matt Wilson
That file is now in the Xconfigurator package. On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote: > > Welcome :) > This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file - > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :) > > > -- > Piotr "Charvel" Majka | PGP & GPG Public Key: finger

Re: XFree86-4.0.1 and Red Hat Linux 6.2

2000-07-09 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, James M. Rogers wrote: >Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 09:22:06 -0700 >From: James M. Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: XFree86-4.0.1 and Red Hat Linux 6.2 > >You don't need an RPM for XFree 4.0 Right, but this is RedHat Li

Re: XFree86-4.0.1 and Red Hat Linux 6.2

2000-07-08 Thread James M. Rogers
You don't need an RPM for XFree 4.0 Goto xfree.org and goto the proper download page for your computer. Get the Xinstall.sh and extract programs, then run the Xinstall.sh program and it will tell you what else you need to download. It will also give you more instructions about how to upgrade.