Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-08 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Prasanth A. Kumar) writes: > basing themselves on RPMS! Also, Mandrake is using it in their > upcoming release. noip we just shipping it as ''alternative'' but we still use LinuxConf in our distribution. -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com Pittsbur

Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-08 Thread Bill Nottingham
John Summerfield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > I tried removing the weed, but found XConfigurator (which I do use > sometimes) use it. I've had to content myself with telling it to shut up > and keep its expletive deleted hands off. The PCI mapping database is needed by Xconfigurator, among othe

Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-08 Thread John Summerfield
> > => rpm -e linuxconf kudzu > on all our several hundert machines. (cfengine rulez ;) I tried removing the weed, but found XConfigurator (which I do use sometimes) use it. I've had to content myself with telling it to shut up and keep its expletive deleted hands off. as for linuxconf; it's

Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-07 Thread Greg Wright
*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 7/06/00 at 10:03 Alvin Starr wrote: >On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Adrian Likins wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 10:10:06PM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Prasanth A. Kumar) writes: >> > >> > > I don't know if anyone has ever t

Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-07 Thread Alvin Starr
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Adrian Likins wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 10:10:06PM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Prasanth A. Kumar) writes: > > > > > I don't know if anyone has ever tried Webmin but I can say it is much > > > more user friendly and less intrusive than Lin

Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-07 Thread Greg Wright
*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 7/06/00 at 9:41 Adrian Likins wrote: >On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 10:10:06PM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Prasanth A. Kumar) writes: >> >> > I don't know if anyone has ever tried Webmin but I can say it is much >> > more user

Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-07 Thread Adrian Likins
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 10:10:06PM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Prasanth A. Kumar) writes: > > > I don't know if anyone has ever tried Webmin but I can say it is much > > more user friendly and less intrusive than Linuxconf. I think Redhat > > should seriously look at

Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-07 Thread Karsten Petersen
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Alvin Starr wrote: > I have started removing linuxconf from all my RH systems or at least > disabling them. It is a real pain when your system will not reboot > just because somebody ran linuxconf. Road trips to the computer room > at odd hours make you really gun-shy. linuxco

Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-06 Thread Prasanth A. Kumar
"Greg Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Webmin is good, much better at this point than Linuxconf (in as far as > problems administrating) , but I cannot see RH taking a rivals system and > using it, its not clear to me what the lic will be also once Caldera starts > steering the boat (if they

Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-06 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Alvin Starr wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Greg Wright wrote: > > I second the motion for Webmin. I have started removing linuxconf from all > my RH systems or at least disabling them. It is a real pain when your > system will not reboot just because somebody ran linuxconf. Roa

Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-06 Thread Levente Farkas
Quoting "Prasanth A. Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I don't know if anyone has ever tried Webmin but I can say it is much > more user friendly and less intrusive than Linuxconf. I think Redhat > should seriously look at replacing Linuxconf with Webmin. I guess the > most serious limitation to W

Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-06 Thread Alvin Starr
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Greg Wright wrote: > On 6/06/00 at 18:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >I don't know if anyone has ever tried Webmin but I can say it is much > >more user friendly and less intrusive than Linuxconf. I think Redhat > >should seriously look at replacing Linuxconf with Webmin. I

Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-06 Thread Greg Wright
*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 6/06/00 at 18:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I don't know if anyone has ever tried Webmin but I can say it is much >more user friendly and less intrusive than Linuxconf. I think Redhat >should seriously look at replacing Linuxconf with Webmin. I guess

Re: Webmin system administration utility

2000-06-06 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Prasanth A. Kumar) writes: > I don't know if anyone has ever tried Webmin but I can say it is much > more user friendly and less intrusive than Linuxconf. I think Redhat > should seriously look at replacing Linuxconf with Webmin. We have. > I guess the most serious limitation