Re: RPM 4 depends on db3-devel? Where do I get that?

2000-09-05 Thread Frank Hale
Frank Hale wrote: > > RPM 4 depends on db3-devel? Where do I get that? > Sorry I found it. -- ICQ: 7205161 http://sapphire.sourceforge.net - Yet another X11 Window Manager ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redha

Re: RPM 4

2000-09-02 Thread jfm2
> > > On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, you wrote: > > > > > > > > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-) > > > > > > > > > > So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own > > > distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05? > > > > Go with RPM 4. Many of the new packages RPM 3.05 will *not

Re: RPM 4

2000-09-02 Thread John Summerfield
> On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, you wrote: > > > > > > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-) > > > > > > > So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own > > distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05? > > Go with RPM 4. Many of the new packages RPM 3.05 will *not* be able to handl >

Re: RPM 4

2000-09-02 Thread John Summerfield
> > > > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-) > > > > So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own > distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05? > Note: Matt's pointed out that Pinstripe used RPM 4. I've downloaded two versions of 3.0.5, both give me trouble. I'd

Re: RPM 4

2000-09-01 Thread Evandro Fernandes Giovanini
> > > > > > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-) > > > > > > > So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own > > distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05? > > Go with RPM 4. Many of the new packages RPM 3.05 will *not* be able to handle > merely based on the version numbe

Re: RPM 4

2000-09-01 Thread Jeff Pitman
On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, you wrote: > > > > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-) > > > > So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own > distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05? Go with RPM 4. Many of the new packages RPM 3.05 will *not* be able to handle merely based on the

Re: RPM 4

2000-09-01 Thread Frank Hale
> > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-) > So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05? Thanks, Frank ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/m

Re: RPM 4

2000-09-01 Thread Matt Wilson
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 07:15:36AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > > If I decide to upgrade to RPM 4 for my customized > > distribution should I build all the RPMs again? Right > > now they are built with RPM 3.04. > > > > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-) Pinstripe used RPM 4.0. M

Re: RPM 4

2000-09-01 Thread John Summerfield
> If I decide to upgrade to RPM 4 for my customized > distribution should I build all the RPMs again? Right > now they are built with RPM 3.04. > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-) It might be a useful test of RPM 4, but I'd not expect it to add anything to your distribution. And, if

Re: RPM 4

2000-08-31 Thread Jeff Pitman
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, you wrote: > If I decide to upgrade to RPM 4 for my customized > distribution should I build all the RPMs again? Right > now they are built with RPM 3.04. I've yet to have any issues. The biggest change between 3.04 and 4.00 is the database handling where it puts the names o

Re: rpm-4 sources

2000-06-21 Thread XosÉ Vázquez
Svante Signell wrote: I can't see it. where is rpm-4?? > > www.rpm.org > > hth > > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Xos=C9=5FV=E1zquez?= writes: > > hi, > > > > > > where can i find the rpm4 sources(tar.gz) ?? > > > > The files at ftp.rpm.org are very _old_ <= 3.x > > > > regards and thanks, > > >

Re: rpm-4 sources

2000-06-19 Thread Svante Signell
www.rpm.org hth =?iso-8859-1?Q?Xos=C9=5FV=E1zquez?= writes: > hi, > > > where can i find the rpm4 sources(tar.gz) ?? > > The files at ftp.rpm.org are very _old_ <= 3.x > > regards and thanks, > > -- > To unsubscribe: > mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null -- To