On 28 Nov 2000, Thilo Mezger wrote:
> Tony Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to start using the Unicode support but I can deal without it for
> > now. Same for list comprehensions.
>
> Install Python 2.0 in /usr/local and call it with
>
> #!/usr/bin/env python2
>
Yes, I've
Tony Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to start using the Unicode support but I can deal without it for
> now. Same for list comprehensions.
Install Python 2.0 in /usr/local and call it with
#!/usr/bin/env python2
or something like this. I just have to agree that upgrading
I'd like to start using the Unicode support but I can deal without it for
now. Same for list comprehensions.
I plan on wrapping a C++ library with the ExtensionClass module, so the
improved suppor would be nice. Again, I can wait.
The Numeric module requires distutils, so I need either Python
All C python modules are binary incompatible with 2.0. It will take
quite some time to work out all the problems there.
What wins are in 2.0 that you really need?
Matt
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:21:27AM -0700, Tony Seward wrote:
> I'm reposting because I didn't get a response the first time.
>
I'm reposting because I didn't get a response the first time.
Is there a timetable for moving to python 2.0 in rawhide? Are there any
outstanding compatibility issues that need to be resolved first?
Tony
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL P