Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-26 Thread Edward S. Marshall
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Sergio Dominguez wrote: > Thing is I am subscribed to the poptop and ipchains mailing list, > and I like to know where the traffic is coming, so these subjects > really help in my case. Looking at your mail program... > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) ...you should ha

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-26 Thread Lars Nordin
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Sergio Dominguez wrote: > Why not just make the subject smaller. Like [rh-dev] or something > like that. > Thing is I am subscribed to the poptop and ipchains mailing list, > and I like to know where the traffic is coming, so these subjects > really help in my case. I second

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-26 Thread Sergio Dominguez
Hi: Why not just make the subject smaller. Like [rh-dev] or something like that. Thing is I am subscribed to the poptop and ipchains mailing list, and I like to know where the traffic is coming, so these subjects really help in my case. Just my 2 cents. Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > [EMAIL

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-26 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-" ) writes: > On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Edward S. Marshall wrote: > > > So, let me put in my vote: PLEASE get rid of that annoying subject > > mangling. > > If we're voting about it, put in my vote for getting rid of the annoying > subject mangling as

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-26 Thread Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Edward S. Marshall wrote: > So, let me put in my vote: PLEASE get rid of that annoying subject > mangling. If we're voting about it, put in my vote for getting rid of the annoying subject mangling as well. Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-26 Thread Edward S. Marshall
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Christopher Abbey wrote: > (don't argue for mail or pine or their ilk, anyone using them knows > how to use procmail or the like, so that's not a valid response.) Actually, it -is- a valid response: I can't use procmail here without jumping through hoops setting up fetchmail

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-25 Thread Christopher Abbey
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Tony Nugent wrote: > Ahh, my old friend procmail. I've had to resort to filtering out > the "Reply-To" lines out of these list messages already, now to > modify this recipe to get rid of more sillyness... would you mind sharing that procmail filter? I'm fairly new to procmai

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-25 Thread Tony Nugent
On Sun Jun 25 2000 at 08:10, Tom Diehl wrote: > I was wondering why all of the sudden someone finds it necessary to > add [redhat-devel-list] to the subject of every message from this list. > Please remove this junk. It takes up half of the available subject line > so that the real subject line s

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-25 Thread Ingo Luetkebohle
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 10:29:22AM -0700, Edwin Huffstutler wrote: > Well, it looks to me like it's because the list got switched to "mailman", > which is better for so many more reasons that the subject line change is a > really minor annoyance. With mailman, the prefix is configurable option, s

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-25 Thread Edwin Huffstutler
[ Tom Diehl wrote: ] > Hi all, > I was wondering why all of the sudden someone finds it necessary to > add [redhat-devel-list] to the subject of every message from this list. > Please remove this junk. It takes up half of the available subject line > so that the real subject line scrolls off of t

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-25 Thread Harry Putnam
Tom Diehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there something I do not understand?? No there is something I do not understand about being carefull when posting ... especially to a list of developers : ) ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROT

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-25 Thread Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > :0hf > * ^Subject:.*\[redhat-dev.*] \] > | sed 's/\[redhat-dev.*]//' OOOPseee Should have been a capital R in both cases and I left trailing junk > > :0hf > * ^Subject:.*\[Redhat-dev.*] > | sed 's/\[Redhat-dev.*]//' _

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-25 Thread Tom Diehl
On 25 Jun 2000, Harry Putnam wrote: > I hardily concur. Its ugly, mind numbing, boring and promotes a > mental state where suicide appears appealing. I'm considering setting > my self on fire until such time as Redhat fixes this. > > Joking aside. It is ugly. This .procmailrc recipe will str

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-25 Thread Harry Putnam
Tom Diehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > I was wondering why all of the sudden someone finds it necessary to > add [redhat-devel-list] to the subject of every message from this list. > Please remove this junk. It takes up half of the available subject line > so that the real subject line

[Redhat-devel-list] New subject format on this list.

2000-06-25 Thread Tom Diehl
Hi all, I was wondering why all of the sudden someone finds it necessary to add [redhat-devel-list] to the subject of every message from this list. Please remove this junk. It takes up half of the available subject line so that the real subject line scrolls off of the screen. In a lot of cases thi