leXX" with XX being
the numbers from 1 to 500,000 then you could create 500 directories
and put "file123456" into directory "123". Get the idea?!
BTW, the reason why this is so slow is because ext2 is using a
linear search through the inode-table.
Cheers
Thilo
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> who knows there is people east of Rhode Island in the fabled countries of
>> France, United Kingdom and Germany. :-)
> There are a number of us actually. (Most of us don't have a separate /usr
> partition though, so we don't notice. ;) )
> Wh
Tony Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to start using the Unicode support but I can deal without it for
> now. Same for list comprehensions.
Install Python 2.0 in /usr/local and call it with
#!/usr/bin/env python2
or something like this. I just have to agree that upgrading
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> IMHO, it would be a very good idea to have a 100% posix-compliant /bin/
>> sh without any extensions. /bin/sh should *not* be symlinked to /bin/
>> bash.
> Did you read the documentation?
> Here's another fragment:
>
Hi!
There's a thread on the guinness list about sh/bash/bash2 and I
just wanted to tell you my $0.02 of this /bin/sh vs. bash1/bash2 story.
IMHO, it would be a very good idea to have a 100% posix-compliant
/bin/sh without any extensions. /bin/sh should *not* be symlinked
to /bin/bash.
The rea
