If you're going to use rpm to do it then you want to get the
spec file from /usr/src/redhat/SPECS and build it with some
varient of rpm -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/theSpecIWant. See
the RPM docs on how to rebuild an rpm from an srpm... it's not
exactly the same as building from a tarball ;) You'll
x3270-3.2.14-1.src.rpm requires /bin/ksh i.e. pdksh to install.
rpm -Uvh ../x3270-3.2.14-1.i686.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
/bin/ksh is needed by x3270-3.2.14-1
Build dependencies rpm -qpR x3270-3.2.14-1.src.rpm gives tcl while the
package dependencies shows dependencies indirectl
A Buildrequires: python-devel will be added.
Matt
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 12:14:12AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Shouldn't newt depend on perl, see below? Also, one Makefile is
> referring to python2.0, not python1.5 as included in rawhide-20010206.
>
> rpm --rebuild --target=i686 newt-0.50.
Shouldn't newt depend on perl, see below? Also, one Makefile is
referring to python2.0, not python1.5 as included in rawhide-20010206.
rpm --rebuild --target=i686 newt-0.50.20-3.src.rpm
gcc -I/usr/include/python2.0 -fPIC -O2 -march=i686 -Wall -I/usr/include/slang -c
snackmodule.c
snackmodule.c:7
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it reasonable to have SDL and SDL_mixer depending on arts
> i.e. kdelibs?
arts is in a separate package.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
Is it reasonable to have SDL and SDL_mixer depending on arts
i.e. kdelibs?
Can arts be packaged separately (.src.rpm) or is it an important part of
kdelibs (-2.0.20010205-1.src.rpm)? It would be nice to install
SDL without the need to build kdelibs (from source, 96 min) to install arts.
rpm -Uvh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Run "make config". This generates a Makefile. There may be a .config
> file that takes care of this.
No it doesn't. It requires a Makefile.
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
http://www2.ami.com.au/ for OS/2 & linux information.
Configuration, networking, combined IBM ftps
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> What's the difference between this and Fisher?
What's the difference between pinstripe and guinness?
Both are steps on the way to
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
http://www2.ami.com.au/ for OS/2 & linux information.
Configuration, networking, combined IBM ftpsites in
That is fast. Thanks a lot.
It looks like that I am so lucky for not being bitten by any of these
problem.
I am running RH7.0, and I usually rebuild the src.rpm to optimized it
for i686.
BTW, I am using openssl 0.9.5a right now. I will try to upgrade it after
this email.
Again, thanks a lot f
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Liguo Song wrote:
> Why do you call it broken? I got it installed on my RH7.0 box. And, I
> have run into any trouble.
>
> Is there anything that I should pay special attention to??
Don't install them on RHL 6.x unless you've updated to errata pam, else a
pam configuration f
Why do you call it broken? I got it installed on my RH7.0 box. And, I
have run into any trouble.
Is there anything that I should pay special attention to??
> 2.5.1p1 and above support it. You can download slightly broken (my bad)
> RPMs from www.openssh.com/portable.html or check out rawhide.
Run "make config". This generates a Makefile. There may be a .config file that takes
care of this.
citl
>From: "Jeffrey Velasquez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: kernel building HOW?
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:18:18 -0800
>
>[Redhat doesn't
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On 22 Feb 2001 18:17:07 -0500, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> > Announcing...
> > Red Hat Linux "Wolverine"
> > (a beta release)
>
> What's the difference between this and Fisher?
This is a more upda
On 22 Feb 2001 18:17:07 -0500, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> Announcing...
> Red Hat Linux "Wolverine"
> (a beta release)
What's the difference between this and Fisher?
--
Florin Andrei
___
Redha
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Werner wrote:
>
> AFAIK, the client sftp is not supported in OpenSSH yet, just the sftp
> server.
2.5.1p1 and above support it. You can download slightly broken (my bad)
RPMs from www.openssh.com/portable.html or check out rawhide.
-d
--
| Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Tony Seward wrote:
> I can't find sftp in the Red Hat OpenSSH RPMs. Is there a reason that it is
> not included?
looks to be in Rawhide openssh-2.5.1p1-1.src.rpm ...
-- Russ Herrold
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL P
AFAIK, the client sftp is not supported in OpenSSH yet, just the sftp
server.
Werner
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Tony Seward wrote:
> I can't find sftp in the Red Hat OpenSSH RPMs. Is there a reason that it is
> not included?
>
> Thanks,
> Tony
>
>
>
> ___
I can't find sftp in the Red Hat OpenSSH RPMs. Is there a reason that it is
not included?
Thanks,
Tony
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
Announcing...
Red Hat Linux "Wolverine"
(a beta release)
Red Hat, Inc. presents a beta release of Red Hat Linux for your
hacking pleasure. First, the regular drill:
This is a beta release of Red Hat Linux. It is not inten
[Redhat doesn't really update there HOWTO procedure pages to keepup with the
current pain & suffering]
I'm obviously new at this...
I installed the kernel-2.2.17-14.src.rpm and it populated
/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES
and it has all the files...
I did up2date and it installed many many things...
I WA
Hi,
Could anyone let me know whether there is any document
which talks about porting a LINUX device driver (PCI)
into QNX?
regard,
Jalaja
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/
__
Karen Shaeffer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 09:30:54AM -0600, Thomas Dodd wrote:
Non-GPL drivers for the linux kerenl are allowed
> > explicitly by Linus.
>
> This is true. But it is not what the questioner was intending to do. The
> questioner specifically stated the intent was to port a
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 09:30:54AM -0600, Thomas Dodd wrote:
> Ivan Jager wrote:
> >
> > I think this is the relevant part of the GPL, but you should still read
> > the whole license.
>
> Read Donald Becker's take on this. He wrote many of the NIC
> drivers in/for the linux kernel (including the
How do I interpret the following messages in the log file /var/log/messages?
Feb 26 11:24:34 crchi38f kernel: ide0: start_request: current=0xc0265000
Feb 26 11:24:34 crchi38f kernel: ide0: start_request: current=0xc0265000
Feb 26 11:24:34 crchi38f kernel: hda: writing: LBAsect=4610975, sectors=8,
Ivan Jager wrote:
>
> I think this is the relevant part of the GPL, but you should still read
> the whole license.
Read Donald Becker's take on this. He wrote many of the NIC
drivers in/for the linux kernel (including the DEC tulip driver)
http://www.scyld.com/expert/license.html
Non-GPL drive
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:14:36AM -0800, Jalaja Devi wrote:
> Yes the driver is GPL!! Don't worry!!
>
Well, Jalaj, there is something I think, and RedHat can help me to better
understand if wrong.
If you plan to port a GPL driver to a non free (and open) OS, you may run in
trouble, that's rig
26 matches
Mail list logo
