Matt Wilson said once upon a time (Tue, 23 Jan 2001):
> We don't publically disclose release schedules - but much can be
> inferred from previous release patterns.
Which is about every 6 months, RH7.0 was released about Sept 26th or so.
Dax
___
Red
The XFree 4.x Matrox G400 DRI support has historically been buggy.
There has been a long standing bug where if you obscured a running OpenGL
app (or switched to a different virtual desktop), the X server would
wedge.
There was a fixed checked into DRI-CVS a few days ago, and after much
banging
We don't publically disclose release schedules - but much can be
inferred from previous release patterns.
Cheers,
Matt
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 04:31:17AM -0200, Evandro Fernandes Giovanini wrote:
> is there a release schedule for redhat linux 7.1?
is there a release schedule for redhat linux 7.1?
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
On Monday 22 January 2001 23:56, you wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:14:50PM -0200, Evandro Fernandes Giovanini wrote:
> > Em Segunda 22 Janeiro 2001 20:10, you wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > The Debian APT tool is included in Conectiva Linux 6.0 with an RPM
> > > back-end. Are there plans to
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:14:50PM -0200, Evandro Fernandes Giovanini wrote:
> Em Segunda 22 Janeiro 2001 20:10, you wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The Debian APT tool is included in Conectiva Linux 6.0 with an RPM
> > back-end. Are there plans to include it in RHL ? I guess it would make
> > package i
RedHat has released iputils-20001010-1 as an update to 7.0. The base
distribution included iputils-2418-6. Between these two, iputils
was modified to utilize the new SO_TIMESTAMP support found in the 2.4.0
kernel. But, the code is nicely #ifdef'd so that if you don't want it,
it won't be co
> I have wget pointed at important directories at my favourite mirror. It
> runs unattended (as does my internet connection). From there I do the
> occasional rpm --freshen on as many systems as I want.
>
> One of my other reservations about up2date is its utility for updating more
> than one syst
Hi,
The glint package in the updates directory for Red Hat 5.2 is incorrect;
it requires a version of rpm < 3.0, and thus cannot be used with rpm 3.0.5
included in the updates.
(Yes, I actually do have a 5.2 machine in production. ;-)
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> U
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> fairly lightweight. Protocol overhead is mostly lost in the noise of
> anything but the smallest packages, and there is currently work being
> done to reduce the overhead significantly anyway (it kind of adds up
> server side ;->)
> Now if I could only make
Hello,
The Debian APT tool is included in Conectiva Linux 6.0 with an RPM
back-end. Are there plans to include it in RHL ? I guess it would make
package installations and upgrades a lot easier than they are now.
--
Arnaud
___
Redhat-devel-list mail
Em Segunda 22 Janeiro 2001 20:10, you wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The Debian APT tool is included in Conectiva Linux 6.0 with an RPM
> back-end. Are there plans to include it in RHL ? I guess it would make
> package installations and upgrades a lot easier than they are now.
agree with you; redhat could a
Em Segunda 22 Janeiro 2001 21:08, you wrote:
> Coming soon... The problem is that the package may require
> dependencies on more than one CD. Then you're going to be in
> trouble...
>
> Matt
actually, conectiva 6.0 has two cds (main and extra) and it works fine.
Evandro
Coming soon... The problem is that the package may require
dependencies on more than one CD. Then you're going to be in
trouble...
Matt
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:31:57PM +0100, Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) writes:
>
> > up2date is better than apt at
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 06:53:05AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > In a bigger scale this would also be way faster on 100 Mbit/s
> > connection ;-)
>
> I have wondered about up2date and modems. Not enough to actually try it
> though...
fairly lightweight
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> In a bigger scale this would also be way faster on 100 Mbit/s
> connection ;-)
I have wondered about up2date and modems. Not enough to actually try it
though...
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
http://www2.ami.com.au/ for OS/2 & linux information.
Configuration, networking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) writes:
> up2date is better than apt at updating systems, FTTB (authentication
> of all parts, signed packages (and checking thereof), encrypted
> communication).
As far as I know, you cannot use up2date to install a package with its
dependencies from a
On 22 Jan 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > The Debian APT tool is included in Conectiva Linux 6.0 with an RPM
> > back-end. Are there plans to include it in RHL ? I guess it would make
> > package installations and upgrades
Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> The Debian APT tool is included in Conectiva Linux 6.0 with an RPM
> back-end. Are there plans to include it in RHL ? I guess it would make
> package installations and upgrades a lot easier than they are now.
up2date is better than a
Matt Wilson wrote:
>
> It is because we cannot ship a JDK without licensing problems.
> Shipping a JRE on powertools may be an option if there is some other
> part of powertools that needs a JRE.
there are some package in the powertools which are not needed by any other
packages:-) and even jre
20 matches
Mail list logo
