On Friday, October 13 2000, dann frazier said:
> stop me if i misunderstand - but you're trying to use the 6.2
> genhdlist on rpms from 7.0? 7.0 rpms were built with rpm-4.x, while 6.2
> uses a 3.x version. i got the same problem when i tried to build a
> modified 6.2 distro with some 7.0 rpm
> I can reproduce the problem but I don't have a fix.
> My OS is a redhat-6.2 fully patched server install.
> I ran the genhdlist from the redhat-6.2 files from when I
> downloaded redhat-6.2 and tried to use it to build the hdlist for my
> redhat-7.0 downloaded files.
> First of all the genhdli
When using qmail on RedHat <7.0 I used this in inetd.conf
pop-3 stream tcp nowait root/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
qmail-popup mail.example.com /bin/checkpassword
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
What and where am I to do with Xinetd?
--
Kind regards
Kevin Waterson
_
hey,
stop me if i misunderstand - but you're trying to use the 6.2
genhdlist on rpms from 7.0? 7.0 rpms were built with rpm-4.x, while 6.2
uses a 3.x version. i got the same problem when i tried to build a
modified 6.2 distro with some 7.0 rpms. somewhere, genhdlist uses rpm
calls to scan eac
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Brian K Daniel wrote:
> I can reproduce the problem but I don't have a fix.
> My OS is a redhat-6.2 fully patched server install.
> I ran the genhdlist from the redhat-6.2 files from when I
> downloaded redhat-6.2 and tried to use it to build the hdlist for my
> redhat-7.0
I can reproduce the problem but I don't have a fix.
My OS is a redhat-6.2 fully patched server install.
I ran the genhdlist from the redhat-6.2 files from when I
downloaded redhat-6.2 and tried to use it to build the hdlist for my
redhat-7.0 downloaded files.
First of all the genhdlist program d
Hi,
After having recompiled the Kernel, I have noted that the Xinetd service doesn't
works well:
[root@nirvana neugens]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/xinetd restart
Stopping xinetd: [FAILED]
Starting xinetd: [ OK ]
Situat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > > hi,
> > > first of all I don't know the overall quality of 7.0 since I'm just come
> > > back from my vacation, but I read many mails and news about in which
> > > people are criticize red hat why they include gcc 2.96 in 7.0.
> >
> > gcc 2.96 is a development
> >
> > libc5 should indeed be included, but not as the base libc, but for
> > applications users already have and which work well. Not everyone
> > wants to go through the process of recompiling and retesting their
> > applications just to move from RHL 5.x to 7.x. IN some cases, it's
> > not a
