On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Daniel Hammer wrote:
>is there any reason why Reiser FS is not supported by
>Pinstripe?
Reiserfs is an experimental patch to the kernel. It plays with
stuff in the kernel that is considered non-kosher by Linus et al.
Mainly because the kernel doesn't have a journalling fram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthew Copeland ) writes:
> >> I understand that "officially" it did not enter the
> >> kernel but there are patches by "Mandrake" and "SuSE"
> >
> >It isn't even in the 2.4 kernel - of course, patches can be made. But
> >the kernel group have to feel that we can stand behind
>> I understand that "officially" it did not enter the
>> kernel but there are patches by "Mandrake" and "SuSE"
>
>It isn't even in the 2.4 kernel - of course, patches can be made. But
>the kernel group have to feel that we can stand behind it for it to go
>into our distribution.
Okay, just out
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Hammer ) writes:
> is there any reason why Reiser FS is not supported by
> Pinstripe?
The kernel group thought it too unstable.
> I understand that "officially" it did not enter the
> kernel but there are patches by "Mandrake" and "SuSE"
It isn't even in the 2.4 kern
BS"D
Hi,
is there any reason why Reiser FS is not supported by
Pinstripe?
I understand that "officially" it did not enter the
kernel but there are patches by "Mandrake" and "SuSE"
and I have never heard of any instability problems
with Reiser FS and Linux.
One could offer both, one kernel "off
