Dear All,
How to display PATH anytime instead of just a "$' in RedHat ksh? I remember
PS1 and PWD should be used. But I can't get the exact expression of that. By
the way, I can't find .profile under my home directory. Why?
Thanks,
Bing
_
| How
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Ivan Jager wrote:
>Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:04:48 -0400
>From: Ivan Jager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: Re: rawhide: kudzu-0.68-1 fails to compile
>
>I didn't make the .spec file for the package. It was one i
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Yuzz wrote:
>Unable to load intepreter /lib/linux.so.2 ...
>How to solve this problem??
Sounds to me like you've maxed out your process table. The Linux
process table can only hold 512 simultaneous processes. If you
fill that up, you'll see the above message likely during t
Unable to load intepreter /lib/linux.so.2 ...
How to solve this problem??
--
yuzz
System Engineer
EmasOnline Dot Com Sdn. Bhd.
http://www.EmasOnline.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel No: 606 - 3345666 ext 2174
Fax No: 606 - 3372233
"EveryDay Linux"
___
Red
I didn't make the .spec file for the package. It was one in one of the gnome
packages a long time ago. I will continue building as a normal user and report
the next problem like that as a bug.
Thanks. :)
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Ivan Jager wrote:
> >
> >When building as
Hi all,
any chance to get a support of Adaptec AAA-UDMA on
the next red-hat rls?
It's an IDE raid controller. Adaptec is supplying
drivers for WinNT/2k but not for linux.
I really need some help about this
card...
thx
Michel.
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> If I decide to upgrade to RPM 4 for my customized
> distribution should I build all the RPMs again? Right
> now they are built with RPM 3.04.
I've yet to have any issues. The biggest change between 3.04 and 4.00 is the
database handling where it puts the names o
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > The problem has been that genhdlist barfs on 4.x RPMs.
> >
> > Anyway, I'm feeling real ignorant here. I've got the latest instimage and I
> > can't figure out where to drop my customized comps file. Should I ass
> From: Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 19:17:27 +0300 (EEST)
>
> Comps go to RedHat/base, as before. hdlist is also still
> required. Genhdlist can be found in anaconda-runtime package
> (IIRC).
>
> Custom comps and generated genhdlist work fine with me w/ 4.x RPM
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Freivald, Joseph A, GOVMK wrote:
> I thought one of the other things about Mandrake is they included
> non-exportable encryption, which is not an option for RedHat. No?
No, since they're based in France, they're bound to even more ridiculous
export restrictions.
LLaP
bero
I know that on SCO (and probably other *NIX) that the *tmpx files track the
originating IP and I believe that the utmp* file are used by "w/who" and the
wtmp* file are used by "last". Linux seems to just have the wtmp file and always
store and display the originating IP so the multiple version are
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> The problem has been that genhdlist barfs on 4.x RPMs.
>
> Anyway, I'm feeling real ignorant here. I've got the latest instimage and I
> can't figure out where to drop my customized comps file. Should I assume that
> the comps file is obsolete; th
I thought one of the other things about Mandrake is they included
non-exportable encryption, which is not an option for RedHat. No?
Joe
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike A. Harris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 6:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
If I decide to upgrade to RPM 4 for my customized
distribution should I build all the RPMs again? Right
now they are built with RPM 3.04.
Thanks,
Frank
=
ICQ: 7205161
http://sapphire.sourceforge.net - Another X11 Window Manager
__
Do You Yaho
> Sorry if it seemed I
> was implying
> that you were up to no good, but that wasn't my
> intention. I was
> merely pointing out that others have done so IMHO
> and I think it
> is tasteless and unethical despite the GPL freebie
> status of
> everything.
>
I didn't think you were.
Frank
===
> From: Jeff Pitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 09:22:15 -0600
>
> I'm not sure where the docs are for anaconda, but, I would highly recommend
> using the latest instimage from rawhide or pinstripe or whatever their calling
> it now a days. I've had troubles with the older one
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Frank Hale wrote:
>> Absolutely. That is why I recommend _against_ doing
>> carte
>> blanche search and replace
>> 's/[Rr]ed.*[Hh]at/whatever/g' on
>> things. There is no point other than to try and
>> strip Red Hat of
>> credit due, and in the process destroy copyright
>>
> Absolutely. That is why I recommend _against_ doing
> carte
> blanche search and replace
> 's/[Rr]ed.*[Hh]at/whatever/g' on
> things. There is no point other than to try and
> strip Red Hat of
> credit due, and in the process destroy copyright
> notices, and
> set one's self up for possible le
> An overview of Red Hat's trademarks and their usage,
> see:
>
>
http://www.redhat.com/about/trademark_guidelines.html
>
Thanks everyone for the helpful information, I will
take this into credit when I go about building my
distribution.
Thank you,
Frank
=
ICQ: 7205161
http://sapphire.so
What is the difference between the utmp and utmpx files and why
would one use one over the other or both, etc... I can find no
documenation on them but just stumbled across them in the rc
scripts. Same for wtmp/wtmpx..
TTYL
--
Mike A. Harris Linux advocate
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Stephen C. Biggs wrote:
>> Because I have done so for several years with no problems until
>> last week when I had a "rpm --rebuild" delete several
>> subdirectories on my filesystem during "%clean" stage. RPM
>> should IMHO do anything it does in a chroot()'d jail. Making
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Ivan Jager wrote:
>> Because I have done so for several years with no problems until
>> last week when I had a "rpm --rebuild" delete several
>> subdirectories on my filesystem during "%clean" stage. RPM
>> should IMHO do anything it does in a chroot()'d jail. Making a
>> u
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Matt Wilson wrote:
>Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 00:23:07 -0400
>From: Matt Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: Re: custom dist based on Redhat
>
>Copyright law is fairly clear here. You *must not* remove
>"Copyri
> I am building a custom dist based on RH 6.2. I would like to upgrade my
> RPM version but does this mean I need to rebuild all of my RPMs over
> again?
>
I'd not put 3.0.5 on it; I've downloaded two versions of it that don't work
well.
___
Redh
>
> Delete it. Along with boot.cat, and do a recursive deletion of all
> the ugly (and totally unnecessary) TRANS.TBL files (one in every
> directory).
Better turn on Joliet when you burn you CD; thos TRANS.TBL files are to enable
translation to short names. With Joliet you don't need it.
_
26 matches
Mail list logo
