hi
i have installed rh 6.2i have an avance logic pci sound card(als
4000).i could'nt configure it...can anyone help me out?
regards
varun
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/red
Instead of this mess:
%config
%attr(0755, root, root) /etc/rc.d/init.d/caudium
# For Red Hat 7.x
#%attr(0755, root, root) /etc/init.d/caudium
What is a universal way of doing the same?
%attr(0755, root, root) %{_initscripts}/caudium
Just trying to make packages low maintenance..
TTYL
--
M
Hi all...
Forget about the whole manpage thing. I just finished splitting
up the manpages into separate packages, and then thought before I
sent in a .spec patch to RH, I should get the latest man package
from Rawhide first. After doing a dir on the SRPMS/SRPMS dir for
rawhide, I see:
ncftp /p
I swore there was a basename() function in libc...
Can't for the life of me find it, or figure out what could be
used in its place. I can easily write my own replacement
function, but in the interest of not adding cruft to applications
I'd prefer to use a premade ready to roll function from an
e
> >25 pt_BR ???
>
pt_BR is Brazilian Portuguese.
Fred
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
Just an idea that came to me...
Red Hat has normally been 2 CDROM's. Binary, and SRC.
6.2 is 3, binary, source, documentation.
>From what I understand, 7.0 final will be 4:
Binary1, binary2, source, documentation - possibly source2?
Since it is expanding so much, why not offer it on DVD as
wel
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>313 cs ?
>965 de German
>2027es Spanish
>1625fr French
>706 it Italian
>10 pl Polish
>296 ru Russian
>33 de_DE German (What is the diff from "de"?)
>31 fr_FR French (What is ..
"Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The bad thing about it though is that it seems like it was written
> in Java, then compiled to a Sparc Binary, running on a Sparc
> emulator in Linux under VMware. Redraws take forever.
It _used_ to be the case that you could turn on the page cache
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Chris Rode wrote:
>> Yeah, I got that part allready. It isn't getting included
>> though. The %setup part needs to place the file in with the
>> source code to begin with and it is not. That is the problem I'm
>> having. I'm sure it is simple, but can't quite get it.
>
>T
1 root@asdf:/usr/src/redhat/SPECS# locate basename
/bin/basename
/usr/man/man1/basename.1.gz
/usr/man/ru/man1/basename.1.gz
/usr/man/cs/man1/basename.1.gz
/usr/man/de/man1/basename.1.gz
/usr/man/es/man1/basename.1.gz
/usr/man/fr/man1/basename.1.gz
/usr/man/it/man1/basename.1.gz
Hmm. I'm curious
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
> Yeah, I got that part allready. It isn't getting included
> though. The %setup part needs to place the file in with the
> source code to begin with and it is not. That is the problem I'm
> having. I'm sure it is simple, but can't quite get it.
T
On 18 Aug 2000, Trond Eivind[iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote:
>> > I have:
>> >
>> > package.tgz and "filename.init" in SOURCES.
>> > I want filename.init added to the package as well when it is
>> > built. I've tried various combinations of:
>> >
>> > Source: package.tgz
>> > Source1: filename.i
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Chris Rode wrote:
>Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 14:47:46 -0700 (MST)
>From: Chris Rode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: RPM oddity?
>
>On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
>> I have:
>>
>> package.tgz and "filename.init" in SOURCES.
>> I want filen
Do you have the agpgart module loaded? Try to do a modprobe agpgart. Then
try to recompile the kernel module, but if you look in the README there is an
option SYSINCLUDE= that you will need to use. If you don't then when
compiling it will try to use /usr/include instead of the actual source.
Attempting to get NVIDIA_kernel .94 and NVIDIA_GLX .94 running under 6.9
(something that *many* will want to do):
Problem
---
kernel-headers-2.4.0-0.16 causes the build of the kernel module to die
horrifically (and, even it it happened to work it would produce an NVIDIA
module incapable of f
On 18 Aug 2000, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Rode ) writes:
>
> > On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> >
> > This much is right. To get the file included in the binary RPM, in the
> > %install section of the spec:
> >
> > install $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/filename.ini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Rode ) writes:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
> > I have:
> >
> > package.tgz and "filename.init" in SOURCES.
> > I want filename.init added to the package as well when it is
> > built. I've tried various combinations of:
> >
> > Source: package.tgz
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Even in a beta release I think a bug of this magnitude
It's a beta release. It's a release to fix problems.
Whining that a beta release doesn't meet your standards for quality is
a useless, stupid waste of time. If you can't stand the heat, get out
of the beta.
A
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> I have:
>
> package.tgz and "filename.init" in SOURCES.
> I want filename.init added to the package as well when it is
> built. I've tried various combinations of:
>
> Source: package.tgz
> Source1: filename.init
This much is right. To get the fi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Those were my thoughts after discovering a grievous bug in the
> printing system of Pinstripe: printing does not work from home
> directory. Problem is that home directory's permissions 700 don't
> allow the setuid lpr to access file under it unless you are root.
> Ev
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Checking the actual build, "configure" ends off saying:
>>
>> Pike binary used: /usr/pike/7.0.71/bin/pike
>> Pike version: 7.0.71
>> Pike include dir: -I/usr/pike/7.0.71/include/pike
>>
>> The above pike
Those were my thoughts after discovering a grievous bug in the
printing system of Pinstripe: printing does not work from home
directory. Problem is that home directory's permissions 700 don't
allow the setuid lpr to access file under it unless you are root.
Even in a beta release I think a bug
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Jonathan Sailor wrote:
>Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 15:41:08 -0400
>From: Jonathan Sailor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: RedHat Devel List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: ppp nukes eth0: fixed
>
>For those of you who want to know how I got ppp to stop nuking
>eth0, I switched to Linux Man
> X-Apparently-From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "Jonathan Sailor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> For those of you who want to know how I got ppp to stop nuking eth0, I =
> switched to Linux Mandrake 6.
>
Some remarks for this:
1) I have been usig ppp and ethernet for months with no problem on
Red
>
> I just installed an RPM package, then repackaged it and tried to
> install the update with -Fvh. The update complained that the
> package required pike in /usr/local/bin/pike, as a dependancy,
> and it would NOT install because of it.
>
> So, the existing -3 release installed worked ok, but
For those of you who want to know how I got ppp to
stop nuking eth0, I switched to Linux Mandrake 6.
I just installed an RPM package, then repackaged it and tried to
install the update with -Fvh. The update complained that the
package required pike in /usr/local/bin/pike, as a dependancy,
and it would NOT install because of it.
So, the existing -3 release installed worked ok, but my updated
pac
Kevin Ford wrote:
>
> http://www.rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/rawhide/1.0/i386/XByName.html
>
> These are already precompiled.. Might have dependencies... Source RPM..
>
> ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/rawhide/1.0/SRPMS/SRPMS/XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.src.rpm
>
> You might want to get a few other source files whi
John Summerfield wrote:
>
> > John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Just what's in a src.rpm that's so useful that is NOT in the spec file?
> >
> > Patches?
>
> You don't need them to see how it was built;-) Well, not unless it was
> configured by patching, and I HAVE seen that
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, EXT Graham Cameron wrote:
> Has anyone had any success with automount/NIS ?
>
> I am having difficulty making this work.
>
> I know my maps are ok, as I'm using it fine on other
> unixes (AIX).
>
> When I try to log in to my linux box, here's what I see:
>
> --
> No direct
30 matches
Mail list logo
