> On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:09:31PM +0200, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > > What about the regular ssh?
> >
> > No way. Its license sucks and it doesn't have any advantages over
> > current versions of OpenSSH.
>
> It has. It's long out in the field.
Since they represent forks of the same o
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Chris Abbey wrote:
>Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 16:44:21 -0500
>From: Chris Abbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: OpenSSH/SSL
>
>At 13:25 7/24/00 +0200, Daniel Roesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>It has. It's long out in the field.
>
>umm... ok, like what
[Mathew Thomas]
> Does anyone know of a system call or technique of finding out how much
> RAM is available for malloc without going into virtual memory? That is
> - how much physical memory can I get befor I start paging or swapping??
> I'm hoping that there is a system call that can give me thi
Does anyone know of a system call or technique of finding out how much
RAM is available for malloc without going into virtual memory? That is
- how much physical memory can I get befor I start paging or swapping??
I'm hoping that there is a system call that can give me this info. Any
help would
At 13:25 7/24/00 +0200, Daniel Roesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It has. It's long out in the field.
umm... ok, like what for instance? I spent about two weeks doing a comparison
and I couldn't find anything in ssh that OpenSSH didn't do, I'm curious what
I missed.
now the forces of openness
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Steven Lord wrote:
> I'm going to have to set up a machine to monitor bandwidth use and ethernet
> packets.
http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/mrtg.html
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/
Hi,
I'm going to have to set up a machine to monitor bandwidth use and ethernet
packets. I plan to use NetCat to write packets from the host and other
machines, but I was looking at using NetPerf for actually logging what else
is going on in our DMZ. I haven't used NetPerf, but I've been told it's
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 12:09:31 +0200 (CEST)
>From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: OpenSSH/SSL
>
>On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
>> Any consideration being made of including OpenSSH
Hello.
I would like to just comment on the TeTeX packaging by Red Hat.
Everyone knows there are several (binary) subpackages:
tetex
tetex-afm
tetex-doc
tetex-dvilj
tetex-dvips
tetex-fonts
tetex-latex
tetex-xdvi
In order to have a functional LaTeX system, almost all of these
subpackages must be
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:09:31PM +0200, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > What about the regular ssh?
>
> No way. Its license sucks and it doesn't have any advantages over
> current versions of OpenSSH.
It has. It's long out in the field.
Best regards,
Daniel (still using ssh 1.2.27)
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Any consideration being made of including OpenSSH and OpenSSL to
> RawHide?
The RSA patent still prevents us from doing this - but fortunately it will
be expiring later this year.
Right now, check ftp://ftp.redhat.de/pub/rh-addons/security.
> What a
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Any consideration being made of including OpenSSH and OpenSSL to
> RawHide? What about the regular ssh? Since the crypto relaxo
> has occured, and there are now crypto products in RH, it would be
> nice to have SSH included by default as well as SSL.
Any consideration being made of including OpenSSH and OpenSSL to
RawHide? What about the regular ssh? Since the crypto relaxo
has occured, and there are now crypto products in RH, it would be
nice to have SSH included by default as well as SSL. I think
those two are likely very highly used, and
13 matches
Mail list logo
