Hello. I would like to just comment on the TeTeX packaging by Red Hat. Everyone knows there are several (binary) subpackages: tetex tetex-afm tetex-doc tetex-dvilj tetex-dvips tetex-fonts tetex-latex tetex-xdvi In order to have a functional LaTeX system, almost all of these subpackages must be installed (the ones not needed are just tetex-doc, tetex-dvilj (if not using the dvilj driver), tetex-dvips (if not generating PostScript outputs) and tetex-xdvi (if not reading DVI)). As there are other basic TeX subsystems distributed with TeTeX besides LaTeX, like omega, context and etex, that the average user will not need, and that are installed with the basic subpackages, and seeing the size of the TeTeX distribution, it would be better, I think, if a new structure for TeTeX subpackages is found that reflects its functional components. Then we could have subpackages like tetex tetex-latex tetex-etex tetex-omega tetex-context tetex-texinfo tetex-afm tetex-fonts tetex-xdvi tetex-dvips tetex-dvilj I would like to hear from the developers about this issue. Romildo -- Prof. José Romildo Malaquias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Departamento de Computação Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto Brasil _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
