ok guys, enough already. If you want to fight spam (1) then come
on over to spamcop.net and join us in fighting it the right way.
I've already lart'd the abuse staff at Anglia Polytechnic University
and explicitly drew their attention to how ill-chosen his target
was - I'm sure they'll teach him a
Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and
> > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing.
> > > And the Mesa and XFree packages list it as a dependency.
> >
> > They shouldn'
I have been noticing broken case sensitive sorting in recent mc and
textutils upgrades.
When I went from mc-4.5.42 in the 6.2 distribution to the last two
(4.5.50 & 4.5.51) versions from ftp.gnome.org, the case sensitive
directory sort order was broken. Now I have noticed the same problem
when t
Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> I forgot to add this log :(
Netscape strikes again!
> Thomas Dodd wrote:
> >
> > Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > >
> > > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and
> > > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so i
I forgot to add this log :(
-Thoams
Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and
> > > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing.
> > > And the Mesa and XFree package
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and
> > glibc-2.1.3-15. For some reason libGLcore.so is missing.
> > And the Mesa and XFree packages list it as a dependency.
>
> They shouldn't - is this explicitly, or did it ju
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:12:51 -0500,
Thomas Dodd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I just installed kernel-2.2.16-8 from the rawhide srpm
>and the kernel command line is being truncated
>at 80 characters (according to /proc/cmdline)
>Is this lilo or the kernel or redhat patches to one
>of them?
Probabl
Thomas Dodd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote:
> > > This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file -
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :)
>
> I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, and
> glibc-2.1.3-15. For s
I just installed kernel-2.2.16-8 from the rawhide srpm
and the kernel command line is being truncated
at 80 characters (according to /proc/cmdline)
This is with lilo-21.4.1-2 (again from the rawhide srpm).
It was working with my 2.2.14-12 kernel but no doesn't.
The only think I did was install
Matt Wilson wrote:
>
> That file is now in the Xconfigurator package.
>
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:25:13PM +0200, Piotr Majka wrote:
> > This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file -
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards <--- :)
I built this with rpm-3.0.5-0.5, egcs-1.1.2-30, an
As far as I understand updates for redhat 6.2 installation,
I arrive at the following conclusion.
I will focus on redhat-6.2/i386/ and NFS installation only (with or
without kickstart).
a) For RedHat/RPMS use redhat-updates/6.2/i386/
(which can be put in place of old versions for NFS installat
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Steven Lord wrote:
>I've only done it once, and that was because I was on his list 5 times so I
>kept getting 5 copies of his spam, and the fact that despite my efforts he
>wouldn't take me off. He'd use different mail accounts as they were shut
>down, but still keep the same
Of course, spam is evil. But don't be a vigilante! Because of the
totally unauthenticated nature of e-mail, it is usually impossible to
be certain of the perpetrator. Received: lines can be faked just like
nearly every other byte in an e-mail message. I was much more the
victim of spam than an
Hi,
where can I get the split-distro script to burn Rawhide von CD-R ?
I can't find it...
bye
--
Andre Steden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
While I've taken an aggressive approach to SPAM in the past as
well (mailbombs), I've never went as far as you claim to have
done, but I do know one thing... It was a waste of MY time to do
so. Many people said just delete them and ignore, but it is JUST
SO DAMNED HARD to do that when someone is
On 13 Jul 2000, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>Date: 13 Jul 2000 13:07:56 -0400
>From: Trond Eivind Glomsrød <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: ADV: High Search Engine Placement
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernhard Rosenkraenzer ) writes:
>
>> Currently, anyone may post to the list
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Steven Lord wrote:
>I think that prosecuting spammers is far too polite. I had a spammer target
>my hotmail account, filling it up with up to 5 of the same e-mail because my
>address was in it 5 times. I tried reasoning with them, and they'd say
>they'd take me of their list
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Greg Wright wrote:
>>> How is it that this is possible?
>>> Certainly if this were to be exploited by many more companies such as
>this it would diminish the value of this group.
>>
>>Currently, anyone may post to the list so even people who aren't
>>subscribed can get answer
> Hi,
>
> I receive the same message.
> But, I don't have dhcp, or nfs server started.
> I don't understand!...what's the real problemm?.
> Why I receive this message?
>
>
I sometimes get this message when I define a wrong IP address inside
"network --ip" .
--
hi Craig,
I built rpm-4 from the src.rpm in ftp.rpm.org, since many people advise
against using the rawhide rpm. You'll need db3 from there as well. Once
rpm-4/db3 are built and installed, youll need to edit /usr/lib/rpm/macros
before running rpm --rebuilddb. Look for the lines %dbapi and
%dbapi
20 matches
Mail list logo
