"Greg Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Webmin is good, much better at this point than Linuxconf (in as far as
> problems administrating) , but I cannot see RH taking a rivals system and
> using it, its not clear to me what the lic will be also once Caldera starts
> steering the boat (if they
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Alvin Starr wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Greg Wright wrote:
>
> I second the motion for Webmin. I have started removing linuxconf from all
> my RH systems or at least disabling them. It is a real pain when your
> system will not reboot just because somebody ran linuxconf. Roa
Quoting "Prasanth A. Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I don't know if anyone has ever tried Webmin but I can say it is much
> more user friendly and less intrusive than Linuxconf. I think Redhat
> should seriously look at replacing Linuxconf with Webmin. I guess the
> most serious limitation to W
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Greg Wright wrote:
> On 6/06/00 at 18:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I don't know if anyone has ever tried Webmin but I can say it is much
> >more user friendly and less intrusive than Linuxconf. I think Redhat
> >should seriously look at replacing Linuxconf with Webmin. I
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 6/06/00 at 18:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I don't know if anyone has ever tried Webmin but I can say it is much
>more user friendly and less intrusive than Linuxconf. I think Redhat
>should seriously look at replacing Linuxconf with Webmin. I guess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Prasanth A. Kumar) writes:
> I don't know if anyone has ever tried Webmin but I can say it is much
> more user friendly and less intrusive than Linuxconf. I think Redhat
> should seriously look at replacing Linuxconf with Webmin.
We have.
> I guess the most serious limitation
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 6/06/00 at 23:33 Alexandru Sofronie wrote:
>Hi!
>Please help me with following:
>
>I work on a RH Linux 6.2 system and I need to configure it as follows:
>www.something.som
>ftp.something.som
>mail.something.som
>
>But. the big problem is:
>I don't h
I don't know if anyone has ever tried Webmin but I can say it is much
more user friendly and less intrusive than Linuxconf. I think Redhat
should seriously look at replacing Linuxconf with Webmin. I guess the
most serious limitation to Webmin is that it runs over a browser, which
can be a problem
> Enlightenment is a special case - we considered it, and didn't upgrade
> because it integrated worse with GNOME than the version we had. Also,
> it was deemed buggier and not a good choice for the default desktop.
> We will update it for the next release, when sawmill will be the
> default GNOM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Dodd ) writes:
> I had been using Enlightenment DR16.x since August '99,
> but the RH6.2 distro still had the old DR15.x version.
Enlightenment is a special case - we considered it, and didn't upgrade
because it integrated worse with GNOME than the version we had. Also
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (JF Martinez ) writes:
> Problem is: Unless I missed something the gnomba like shipped in
> powertools 6.2 still relies on IP address ranges instead of using
> master browsers. I don't know if it is due to a being old version or
> some error at build time.
Bugzilla is your fri
JF Martinez wrote:
>
> > Thomas Dodd wrote:
> > I just check the gnomba home page.
> > http://gnomba.darkcorner.net
> > SMB browsing from the master browser list
> > was added in version 0.5.9, from Jan 7, 2000
> > according to the change log. The current
> > version is 0.6.2 which has a lot of b
> Thomas Dodd wrote:
> >
> > JF Martinez wrote:
> > >
> > > Tony Nugent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > Ever heard of a thing called swat? It comes with samba itself, and
> > > > is much more comprehensive than gnomba.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes I did. But Swat is
Hi!
Please help me with following:
I work on a RH Linux 6.2 system and I need to configure it as follows:
www.something.som
ftp.something.som
mail.something.som
But. the big problem is:
I don't have an internet eth connexion bu a dial-up one.
I think I know how to manage ppp-up and down and chat
Thanks for the link. I think I have found the answer. I installed 6.1
from CD, and this time I am trying to install from our network here at work,
thus having to configure the network first. The 3c509 apparently has trouble
with resource conflicts on the install, at least in v6.1. I still don'
Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> JF Martinez wrote:
> >
> > Tony Nugent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Ever heard of a thing called swat? It comes with samba itself, and
> > > is much more comprehensive than gnomba.
> > >
> >
> > Yes I did. But Swat is a configurator and its co
I'm trying to figure out why logins via KDM show up in the output of 'who'
but not in the output of 'w' (and, perhaps by extension, why they show up
in the output of the stock RedHat 6.2 finger program but not the ICSI
distributed finger program that my whole site is running).
I understand that K
I was trying to install 6.2 with the bootnet.img. I get to the point
where it asks me what NIC I have, and 3c509 is not in the list. Prior
versions had this driver, where did it go. When I choose any of the other
3com cards (3c501, 3c590), I get resource conflict, device busy. Has anybody
exp
Hello, I would like to write a C/Motif grogram that
pops up with texts inside
the GUI, and It will self destructive after 10
minutes. I know how to write
the popup GUI, but I do not know how to make it
disappear in 10 or 20
minutes.
Thanks in advance,
John
JF Martinez wrote:
>
> Tony Nugent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Ever heard of a thing called swat? It comes with samba itself, and
> > is much more comprehensive than gnomba.
> >
>
> Yes I did. But Swat is a configurator and its counterpart is GnoSamba
> not Gnomba. Gnomb
20 matches
Mail list logo
