Svante Signell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> According to ftp.redhat.com/pub/rawhide the latest release is
> rawhide-release-2000418 containing kernel-2.3.99-4 while mirrors,
> for example ftp.sunet.se has rawhide-release-2000424 with
> kernel-2.2.14-11!!
>
> Whats up?
Should be resolved sometime
I found it on another server:
ftp://ftp.fi.muni.cz/pub/linux/redhat-rawhide/i386/RedHat/RPMS/
Kirk
>At 08:35 PM 5/4/00 +0200, you wrote:
>According to ftp.redhat.com/pub/rawhide the latest release is
>rawhide-release-2000418 containing kernel-2.3.99-4 while mirrors,
>for example ftp.sunet.se has
So I'm rebuilding my samba rpms to get smbspool (left out of the RH6.2
rpms) and I see that the install section is hand-coded. Why doesn't
it just use the samba make install?
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
190 days, 19 hours, 38 minutes, 2 seconds till we run away
According to ftp.redhat.com/pub/rawhide the latest release is
rawhide-release-2000418 containing kernel-2.3.99-4 while mirrors,
for example ftp.sunet.se has rawhide-release-2000424 with
kernel-2.2.14-11!!
Whats up?
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
> How about with the 2.3.99pre kernels?
>
> (I don't have the offending card, but I'd like to clear the air)
Since the driver just got a major update - I dont know. The goal is certainly
to be totally 2.95 friendly
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (since I can't find any others on the gcc mailing lists) is probably
> > that it hasn't been officially contributed with legal papers signing
> > the copyright over to the FSF.
>
> I don't have it here any more; it fell victim to my cleanup with I
Expect is probably the best way :-) works on FTP so telnet should not be
an issue
--
Greg Wright
IT Consultant Sydney Australia PH 0418 292020
Available for Global Contracts Int. +61 418 292020
web http://www.ausit.come-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T/A AAA Computers & ITpro & Ozzie Soft,
> > -gcc 2.95.2 is 99% ready but not 100%. It happenned only a couple
> > times in dozens of builds I made with it but I caught it miscompiling
> > or failing to compile things who compiled well with egcs.
>
> We have one known kernel problem left with gcc 2.95.2 and x86 in 2.2.16pre
> and its
> John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > One thing I do not understand; why has stackguard (or similar) not been
> > incorporated into gcc 2.95 and/or egcs?
>
> Well, for one thing, not all programs will work with stackguard. Most
> notably, the Linux kernel.
That's mentioned in t
> Hi Matt, your first assumption was correct. I just want to write a C
> program
> that use a combination of fork and pipe to run "/usr/bin/telnet" and send
> and receive commands/data via telnet pipes. What I am after is I want to
> be able to create a two way pipes, telnet from a local UNIX mac
> Do you know of a site for Linux/DVD related material? That way I can
> probably get answers for many of my questions myself instead of burdening
> every one out here ;-)
www.opendvd.org
Alan
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Title: Linux & DVD
Do you know of a site for Linux/DVD related material? That way I can probably get answers for many of my questions myself instead of burdening every one out here ;-)
Danny
>We support DVD ROM drives and to an extend DVD RAM. The extra stuff needed
>for DVD movie playback
> Does anybody have an idea as to the status of DVD support under RH, My
> company want's to be sure it can anwser any queries from customers regarding
> Linux support for our new drives.
We support DVD ROM drives and to an extend DVD RAM. The extra stuff needed
for DVD movie playback is not incl
Title:
Hello All,
Firstly if this message reaches the list in HTML, I would like to apologise. Work uses MS Exchange which is a pain and setting my message to plain text usually has no effect.
Does anybody have an idea as to the status of DVD support under RH, My company want's to be sure
14 matches
Mail list logo
